12-19-2015, 08:32 PM | #111 |
First Lieutenant
143
Rep 370
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 02:17 AM | #112 | |
Lieutenant
276
Rep 417
Posts |
Quote:
I get what you are saying about tuning companies and R&D, but I think there are some out there that are a little better than others who do conduct testing to ensure longevity and reliability.
__________________
F82 M4 | 6-speed manual | PP performance Stage 2 tune | Re-valved Bilstein B16s | VRSF midpipe | OEM CS front splitter | OEM GTS hood | OEM M-performance rear diffuser| Evolve tuning catless downpipes | 310rwkw (415rwhp)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 07:52 AM | #113 |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,404
Posts |
And yet, what do people do to their M cars when they want to, say, improve their on-track performance?
Oh, that's right... They rip off all of the hard work the suspension engineers put in, and replace it with aftermarket struts/shocks/springs/swaybars/bushings/etc. Don't over-hype the OE engineering aspect. BMW engineers have to sell you a car that's going to both perform well, ride well, and meet price targets. There are compromises everywhere. Compromises that the aftermarket doesn't have to make. If you're less concerned about cost, for example, you could toss your relatively cheap OE suspension in the garbage and slap on a set of Ohlins that "M" engineers only wish they had the budget for. Heck, even an OTS Bilstein monotube, or a Koni yellow, is a better built, longer lasting strut/shock than what comes from the factory. It's ridiculous to claim that BMW's stock hardware is superior for everyone, for all uses. Ridiculous thing to say, and normally said by people who have no idea what they're talking about, nor actually spend much time exploring their car's potential.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs) '14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat) '08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat) |
Appreciate
1
|
12-22-2015, 01:49 PM | #114 | |
Lieutenant General
4972
Rep 10,200
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 2022 718 Spyder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Quote:
It's just that the culmination of all those different aftermarket parts would never be better than that which the ///M division came up with on its own - just from the standpoint of a cohesive product, in which all the connecting pieces within work well together, and as a whole.
__________________
Past rides: 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 02:13 PM | #115 | |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,404
Posts |
Quote:
"Better" at what? To repeat, M Division has to make all kinds of compromises, both in dynamic aspects (ride comfort, "safe" handling) as well as cost. If your M2 is a track car, you can be sure that the culmination of the right aftermarket parts can be "better" than the factory components (many of which are actually fairly low quality compared to what you can find in the aftermarket). Let's just take an example, naturally, this car is going to have a fair bit of understeer dialed into it to keep the lawyers happy. Correcting that via small suspension changes in the aftermarket can't result in a car that is "better" than stock? More understeer somehow makes a car more of a "cohesive product"? What? Replacing fairly poor factory shocks with upgraded aftermarket units can't possible make the car better? What? Just stop with the "you can't improve over M divisions engineers" already. It's a tired, old, silly argument. Everyone has different priorities, budgets, etc. One size does not fit all. The very fact that the car was built to a price target ABSOLUTELY means that there can easily be room for improvement if you're not bound by those same fiscal limitations.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs) '14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat) '08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 02:51 PM | #116 | |
Lieutenant General
4972
Rep 10,200
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 2022 718 Spyder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Quote:
Can it be improved? Of course it can. Would you rather improve an M car or a 235? That was the question I was responding to...
__________________
Past rides: 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
|
Appreciate
1
|
12-22-2015, 03:09 PM | #117 |
Moderator
30011
Rep 13,167
Posts |
__________________
///M is art ↔ Artemis
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 03:39 PM | #118 |
Second Lieutenant
185
Rep 233
Posts |
While I don't have an opinion for or knowledge of suspension components, I was a systems engineer for many years. When building a system you specify the pieces that meet thought out requirements, you put them together and verify they work. Then, and this is a critical step, you test and tune the whole system to ensure that the requirements you started are met. I do not doubt that there are better parts available than what is being provided on the M2. What I do doubt is that if you share the vision of an M2: a daily driver that can be tracked, you will not easily do better than what BMW has provided.
As for building a dedicated track car, what does history say? Folks used to buy E36 M3's for this purpose. Don't know about later models. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 05:45 PM | #119 |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,404
Posts |
What's the popcorn for? Do you know who makes the stock shocks for most BMWs?
You think the stock Boge/Sachs/etc. twin tube shocks that come with these cars stock are anything special, at all? They're bleh in the grand scheme of things. Hence, the common-knowledge that OE struts/shocks are good for MAYBE 40 or 50k miles. They don't hold a candle to something like an aftermarket Koni yellow or a basic Bilstein inverted monotube. Let alone something more high end. But there's a reason for that. COST. Are they bad compared to other OE offerings? Of course not. But that doesn't make them nice either. The very same companies that make the struts/shocks for BMW also make the aftermarket offerings, most of which are above the OE replacements in their own product lines for god sakes. You're right, all of those people putting Konis, Ohlins, or Bilsteins on their M cars would be better served spending $400 a corner on a run of the mill "BMW" branded Sachs twin tube. Again, and not trying to be mean, people that post stuff like this have no clue what the heck they're talking about. Again, "BMW knows best" doesn't apply when they have to hit a cost number. If BMW could afford to sell their cars with even a basic inverted monotube, or adjustable Konis/Ohlins stock they sure as shit would. They're limited by cost. They have to pick and chose where to put the money in their budget. Which is why it's absurd to think these cars get the best of everything.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs) '14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat) '08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 06:02 PM | #120 | |
Always +10MPH
1005
Rep 626
Posts |
Quote:
Since we are talking about shocks, I think we all agree there are aftermarket parts that's better than OE parts. but what is better? the aftermarket shock design alone by it self is no doubt "better", but as with all aftermarket parts, they're designed to fit many applications. All everyone is saying is that OE parts were tested and refined as a whole M2 package and that can be an advantage when you're not just thinking about lap times. Yes the you can find individual parts that are far superior to OE parts. But adding all these parts together, will the car as a whole perform or feel how you want it? depends. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
12-22-2015, 06:30 PM | #121 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1120
Rep 1,644
Posts |
Quote:
OEM parts might be cheap in quality so they can be mass produced easier, but the dampening rate of a stock M2 shock was developed using THOUSANDS of hours of track testing. No aftermarket company has the resources to spend that much time perfectly matching a shock to spring rates. Yes, the quality of the KONI will probably exceed the OEM but you'll never get that exact dampening rate match with the springs that the OEM had. That doesn't necessarily mean its "worse" just not he intended design from the M engineers. If you want to dial in a crap ton of oversteer then by all means go for it, but you'd be fooling yourself to say it makes the car "better" in general just because YOU like it that way. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 07:06 PM | #122 |
Major General
7392
Rep 7,340
Posts |
Just out of curiosity, are M shocks / struts always twin-tube? Have they ever had Bilstein OEM a gas monotube?
Also, to go along with the above. You won't be getting the subframe and other chassis reinforcements or changes BMW has made on the M2 if you start from a 235. You'll also need to figure out a way to fit wider wheels and tires that don't fit properly on a 235. Good luck doing all that for less than the delta in price between the two. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2015, 07:08 PM | #123 |
Moderator
30011
Rep 13,167
Posts |
It seems that we're talking at different frequencies.
The message that others and myself are trying to get across is the fact that BMW M offers an integrated package with quality parts that are fit for purpose. All super-duper top-notch parts ? Not necessary. Compliance with other parts & fitness for purpose are key + rules and regs need to be observed to keep the car street legal + safety margins for longevity reasons. That brings us to the question what that 'purpose' may be. You cannot dispute that the purpose of an M2 unmistakably also includes the likelihood of quite some M2 buyers regularly driving it on urban roads featuring potholes and road bumps + boring queuing in tailbacks. Not just squeezing every oomph out of it during a couple of spirited track sessions from time to time.
__________________
///M is art ↔ Artemis
|
Appreciate
1
|
12-23-2015, 05:18 AM | #124 | |
Colonel
4407
Rep 2,856
Posts
Drives: BMW M2 CSL Turbomeister
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Travelling / Managing / Writing
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2015, 05:54 AM | #125 |
Captain
1146
Rep 893
Posts |
For me the choice is rather simple in a question like this if i were a buyer or speculating to buy an 1M for example and i went to a BMW dealership! There were 2 identical 1Ms next to each other one had 30 000 kms on it, The other one had 10 000 kms on it but the first one was stock and wasn't mixed with in any other way. I think i would lean towards the stock one rather then the modified one mostly because its hell of a risk modifying a car even if you know what you are doing its always gonna be "What if" if its stock then i know no one has mixed or changed anything its the same it was the day it left the factory and no one has touched anything in regards to modifying that is.
I like modifying my car but if i were buying one i would want it to be stock and not modified even if the parts were from great companies out there. If i were to buy a modified car. Then i would want all documentation that it was done by professionals and it gave me a long warranty that if something brakes due to their products they will repair the damage that it causes to the car and the parts that have broken down will be replaced for free. But even then its to late cause your cars resale value will have dropped a lot. So i guess its choice of the mind and what keeps you calm when driving it. Do you feel just as safe driving a car that is modified. Or safer when driving a stock car from factory that has 100 upon 100 hours of testing done to it to be the best that i can be with all parts working together. There is a lot of companies that manufactures great quality products for cars. That are better then OEM parts but have they been tested to that extent with that specific car you are mounting the part on ? Will it void the warranty will the company cover and damage caused by installing their part if it fails some point later? Thats always on my mind if i am going to install after market parts on my car even if they are better then OEM ones.
__________________
Current Car: Bicycle
Former Car:BMW i4 M50 Brooklyn Grey (MY22)| BMW i3s BEV (MY19)|Former Car: BMW X1 20d x-drive (MY16)|BMW m235i (MY14)|Former Car: BMW 120d (MY12)|Former Car: Volvo C30 T5 R-Design (MY08)|Former Car: Volvo C70 T5 (MY06)|Former Car: Volvo S40 2.0T(MY1999) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2015, 06:15 AM | #126 | ||
Banned
7909
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
Just saw the 135 to 1M conversion of 1LittleMonster...15k of mods in his case. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2015, 12:08 PM | #127 |
Major
516
Rep 1,001
Posts |
Coming from an STI that had little in the way of sound deadening I can tell you this is not a good thing for a daily driver. Yes you'll hear more exhaust noise, but also a LOT more road/tire noise, and it gets on your nerves after a while. Track or weekend car, sure, but commuting 20+ miles every day? No thanks.
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
|
01-01-2016, 12:30 AM | #128 | |
Major
291
Rep 1,075
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: F87 M2 MT MPE, E84 PP SP LP
Previous: F30 - 335i AT, E90 - 335xi MT, E90 - 330i MT, E46 - 330i MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|