04-29-2019, 12:21 PM | #23 |
Lieutenant
217
Rep 519
Posts |
Sure, if ET50 was an option for the rears, or even a 9" version that was flusher, I'd do it. But, I love the concavity.
__________________
2019 M2 Comp, MT, BSM
2015 X5 Msport, CB (Hers) 2014 M235i MT, BSM, MPE, Dinan Springs (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
04-29-2019, 12:24 PM | #24 |
Banned
90
Rep 197
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-29-2019, 12:27 PM | #25 |
Lieutenant
217
Rep 519
Posts |
Concavity is what I was after and it's hard enough to get it in the front. I would not have dropped down to 8's.
__________________
2019 M2 Comp, MT, BSM
2015 X5 Msport, CB (Hers) 2014 M235i MT, BSM, MPE, Dinan Springs (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
04-30-2019, 12:45 PM | #26 |
Banned
90
Rep 197
Posts |
https://www.2addicts.com/forums/show...5#post24724205
msendit from this page makes some good commentary on 245s in the front with -3 camber and et35.... MASSIVE and he is on coils quite low.. some feedback into what 235 and 245 widths need to get the job done.... looks like ET40 Front and ET50 Rear with 235 and 265 is A OKAY and a 3mm spacer up front can give us the leg way for 245s maybe... My only dilemma now is achieving the the 235/245 and 265, front and rear, with optimal wheel widths..... I want to keep the meaty look and some less metal could splice a few ounces.... im thinking 8" and 9" wheels but people say otherwise. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|