11-01-2015, 02:51 PM | #67 | |
Captain
463
Rep 957
Posts |
Quote:
HPDE or track days is not racing, If you like the way the car feels than run that setup. Unless you are chasing 10ths of seconds its kind of a moot point. My main setup goals are safety, feel, consumables, then time in that order. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2015, 05:29 PM | #68 | |
Major
330
Rep 1,084
Posts |
Quote:
fair enough, but most of us out there in A and B groups are trying to go as fast as possible autocross is racing in both cases (and on the street) my car feels great |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2015, 06:18 PM | #69 | |
Captain
463
Rep 957
Posts |
Quote:
In any event all I am trying to say is if your car feels great to you and your happy with your times, performance, consumable use than why change it. there are no HPDE medals to win. It is a sport strictly for enjoyment of the driver. I will not even consider setup changes until I am running laps within 1/2 a second consistently for at least a few days, and that is only at my baseline track where I have the most time. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2015, 06:31 PM | #70 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 101
Posts |
tuning after suspension changes
After any suspension changes, you usually have to do additional fine tuning. I'll assume on BMW M235i most everybody would have the common problem on getting it "just right", since you'd be very lucky indeed on the first try!
And from my figure 8 driving test, which is a pretty good low-speed way of feeling the handling, I would say that most people are trying to tackle the problem of understeer. That is what my first impressions of what my own fine tuning will be addressing. Here is the list of possible "cures": Ways to Correct Understeer Raise front tire pressure Lower rear tire pressure Soften front shocks and stiffen bump Stiffen rear shocks Lower front end Raise rear end Install wider front tires Install narrower rear tires Soften front sway bar Stiffen rear sway bar Increase front negative camber Increase positive caster Soften front springs Stiffen rear springs Oversteer and understeer are more common problems in racing than in street driving. As such, weather and track conditions, as well as varying driving styles and abilities will also play a role. Source: Oversteer and Understeer corrections courtesy of Roger Kraus Racing. Last edited by bgregg; 11-01-2015 at 06:40 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2015, 06:55 PM | #71 | |
Captain
463
Rep 957
Posts |
Quote:
I would start with ride height and spring rate (rear). If symptoms are showing under the conditions described, sounds like too much weight is transferring to the rear under acceleration causing the front end to wash out. I think if I read correctly your ride height has you raked to the rear? Best bet would be some track time to get more input at various speeds and conditions so you can decide what changes would suit you best. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2015, 07:19 PM | #72 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 101
Posts |
suspension settling
Have a tiny amount of suspension settling after having it a couple of days, and jacking the car up a couple of times now to change tires back and forth from street to track, and vice versa.
Currently at 25.5" front and 25.25" rear on the street tires/wheels. So as Pparana suggests, I will try getting the rear a little bit higher than the front for understeer correction. Maybe the rear I'll try 25.75, which is a half-inch change in height. Recall that I am as low as I can go in front, but have tons of height adjustment in the rear! Will also be trying narrower rear track tires, as mentioned previously and that also counts toward understeer correction. For the obvious reasons of preserving street comfort, I'll avoid trying the next step up in rear springs (which would be 700 lb/bin), for now. I value the street comfort too highly! On most cars, I would just do the rear swaybar only. But since this car is so labor expensive on swaybars, try other options first. I could try even more negative camber in front since I can now do that pretty easily. Last edited by bgregg; 11-04-2015 at 11:05 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2015, 09:09 PM | #73 | |
Captain
463
Rep 957
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2015, 10:47 AM | #74 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 101
Posts |
more suspension fine tuning
During my figure 8 testing my observation/complaint was not about body roll at all. I think the guys with Dinan or H&R spring setups do benefit from swaybars, so that is a smart decision for them. But, since I have dealt with body roll already primarily through the Eibach race springs I may be able to use a smaller hammer solution.
I am thinking I need about 3 or 4 smaller hammers simultaneously in NASCAR pit stop style. And I am motivated to try all the inexpensive ones first. So I am thinking of doing the following ones: 1. increase rear ride height 2. increase front tire pressures 3. decrease rear tire widths (not cheap, wanted to do that anyway for safety reasons and rotation reasons) 4. increase front negative camber and maybe decrease rear negative camber and get a 1.0 difference between front and rear. Something like -2.8 front and -1.8 rear? With the limited slip, the rear end is gripping in an awesome way. So rear is dominant right now. What sounds optimal to me is just enough negative rear camber to prevent tire wear, but not so much as to lose the acceleration capabilities of the rear down the straights. During my figure 8's the front always lost grip a lot sooner than the rear. What I am looking for is more equal grip front and rear so that they lose grip about the same point. Then the rest is up to me as the driver to adjust my driving style to the car. The compromise solution is usually this: corner entry (understeer), mid-corner (neutral), corner exit (power on oversteer). Last edited by bgregg; 11-02-2015 at 01:08 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2015, 11:41 PM | #75 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 101
Posts |
spring comparisons
Got a few more days in of regular driving:
I am quite happy for a "street" car with the 440 lb/in front springs and 650 lb/in rear springs. The ride is still comfortable to me, as in firm but not at all harsh. A trackrat might like to experiment with the 475 lb/in front springs and 700 lb/in rear springs that are a step up from where I am at. With my current spring rates, the car is much stiffer than the Dinan (10% stiffer than stock) and H&R lowering springs. I also had a brief experience with the Eibach Pro-Kit springs before the Eibach Race springs. EDC was being called upon much more to perform anti-dive control with the soft springs. I have a lot more built-in anti-dive with this setup. Similarly, a lot of anti-roll built in. The main spring observation I can make is to skip over the 5" 425 lb/in front springs, because they did not hit the target. Mainly due to the 5" length rather than the 425 lb/in rating. It was just inadequate spring travel range. 6" length is just right. Relative to stock, am I about 2X the spring rate in front over stock? It definitely doesn't feel like that much, but maybe numbers are deceiving to feel. It may be too complicated a question to answer, since Ground Control carefully avoided comparing progressive and linear. So I am presumably 2X stiffer in the soft/progressive range of the stock spring, but then as it ramps up I am only 1.5X stiffer, and so on. On track, a progressive spring will eventually take a "set" as it gets past the soft range and into the firmer range. So the driver has to get used to the idea of some non-linear performance in roll (and in dive). Hence why linear springs are easier to drive on a track, and why I said that I liked them. Also, explains why people like adding swaybar upgrades to the progressive spring setups (both front and rear) to take some of that effect back out. I have not noticed any problems with using a fairly comfortable linear spring set. No unwanted oscillations or bouncy or floating behavior. On a cost basis, the coilover conversion kit without damper upgrades or swaybar upgrades compares to doing lowering springs+pair of swaybars+camber plates, to put that in some perspective. Both solutions would probably be using camber plates so that is just a small difference, however my camber plates seem to be better off in fitment to a 2.5" coilover spring and staying in compression even with the car off the ground. That said, I think a Dinan spring+complete swaybar+camber plate setup would drive quite well. I did have a Dinan setup on a previous BMW. And I had an AC Schnitzer setup on another BMW. This is my first Ground Control setup. Today after driving my car, I got out of it and smiled-this is good! Last edited by bgregg; 11-04-2015 at 10:19 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2015, 06:15 PM | #77 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 101
Posts |
mountain drive
Adjusted my rear suspension up to equal the front height, so have everything at 25.5" on all corners. By jacking the car up in the air to take all load off the swaybar, I was able to do the rear height adjustment. Since the height adjusters were not under spring load, I was able to turn them by hand to bring them into contact with the spring and get the desired height. Way easier than I was expecting, actually.
Then took the car out on street tires to re-run the figure 8 test one more time. On street tires I felt that the rear did want to be playful. So the handling to me is like throttle steering. A little bit different than the feel on race tires. The handling is almost optimized already for street tires the way I have it. Proceeded after that to do one of my favorite mountain drives, which really tests the suspension ability to keep tires on the road, with the crests and falls. And also test the suspension travel from some pretty hard dips. This type of driving I do more often than racetrack driving. Got to give it high marks of praise! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2015, 04:31 AM | #79 |
Lieutenant
284
Rep 566
Posts |
bgregg, excellent work. glad you sorted it out so well. thanks for the detailed writeup. this may be very helpful.
Last edited by x233; 11-08-2015 at 04:47 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2015, 11:41 PM | #81 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 101
Posts |
Only available directly from Ground Control, and I don't think they have updated their website to mention the kit for F22 availability. I found out about it just by E-mailing them to ask what they had. It was around $1075 with tax+shipping. The springs would be available from any Eibach reseller/authorized distributor (which Ground Control is in N. California). The camber plates and height adjusters were custom items from Ground Control.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2017, 09:06 PM | #82 |
Private
11
Rep 92
Posts |
Any updates on this? Been looking more and more into this setup lately. Since I have a set of Koni yellows laying around, thought I'd put it to use with this kit. I've already emailed GC and they said they are able to adapt their kit for the Koni's.
So did the 440 lb 6 inch springs end up being the best fit? My goal for the car is quite similar to yours as well.. the odd autox/track day, spirited backroad runs, and dd. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-21-2017, 10:29 AM | #83 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 101
Posts |
Yes, the kit is holding up well for me still. No real changes in noise or anything since I first installed it. I would say 6 inches for front springs is best, since you'll actually be able to go over a speedbump or uneven pavement without cringing. You'll still cringe on a major pothole though, so I try to avoid those!
|
Appreciate
1
Ace60411.00 |
01-24-2017, 05:13 PM | #84 |
Supreme Allied Commander
3863
Rep 54,426
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|