[Scadam]

If anyone has had their M240 on a dyno, would you please share your results and list your mods if any.


I will be going this Friday to have mine done and will be posting the results soon.

[dradernh]

Originally Posted by Scadam

If anyone has had their M240 on a dyno, would you please share your results and list your mods if any.

It would also be useful if posters listed the manufacturer and model no. (if any) of the dyno.

[Scadam]

Originally Posted by dradernh

It would also be useful if posters listed the manufacturer and model no. (if any) of the dyno.

Mine will be done on a dynojet.

[nikman011]

Mustang Dyno

[Scadam]

Originally Posted by nikman011

Mustang Dyno

Thanks man, btw I messaged you back with some answers, not sure if you got it yet or not. But to make it simple I say go for it and get the dp.

[nikman011]

Originally Posted by Scadam

Thanks man, btw I messaged you back with some answers, not sure if you got it yet or not. But to make it simple I say go for it and get the dp.

Yes, ended up with the Catted VRSF, crazy loud, oh well, ..... 🤣

[Scadam]

Originally Posted by nikman011

Yes, ended up with the Catted VRSF, crazy loud, oh well, ..... 🤣

do you notice the difference even without tune?

[nikman011]

Originally Posted by Scadam

do you notice the difference even without tune?

i had a stage 1 MP for the drive home (about 10 miles), then applied MPS2, ran that for about a week, switched to HC Performance Stage 2. So, really haven't run it without a tune. Both MP, & HCP said this is it until I either run meth, or get HPFP, which I am not aware of one that is available, also a stage 2/3 turbo. This is a Mustang Dyno, so figure about 7%-13% difference against a DynoJet, at least that is what I have read. I also search for a stock Mustang Dyno # on a m240i xDrive, and found a few numbers ranging from 275-285, so figure a total difference of roughly 85-95 HP gain. As new tunes come out, as well as transmission tunes, I will probably try them out. The goal for me is to find the tune that I like the most. I feel like there isnt much difference it peak HP between MP/HCP, but the distribution of power is different, .... so, we will see what the skinny is
Also, not sure it matters, but this dyno was done on All Season Run Flats at stock PSI

Also, if we factor a 7% difference in the Mustang/DynoJet, 399WHP, .... so maybe it hits 400+@wheels on a DynoJet, ...

ONE MORE thing, ....... I now feel like I have TOO much power, as it relates to my daily driving, especially since it is now SNOWING where i live, ..... I feel VERY restricted in the amount of power I can use because of the road/weather conditions, .... so VERY sad, ....... I can only imagine what happens in the spring when I put my Pilots on, ...... oh boy!

PS:
I am really interested in what Dinan is going to release with their B58 Flash 2019Q2

[dradernh]

Originally Posted by nikman011

This is a Mustang Dyno, so figure about 7%-13% difference against a DynoJet, at least that is what I have read.

NASA has some useful information here regarding percentage differences between dyno types: https://www.nasaproracing.com/forms/...ation_form.pdf. Note also their requirements for tire pressures. I think you can count on wider and softer rubber making your numbers go up, especially if you run them at somewhat lower than normal pressures. The dyno operator can advise you about that - they know how to get the numbers up!

My experience with RWD is that both Dyno Dynamics and Dynapack dynos are ~10% below that of a Dynojet. My East Coast Dynapack tuning was done at Turner Motorsports and on the West Coast at Dinan.

One interesting thing came up at both Turner and Dinan: each dyno operator told me that there was a fair amount of variability in day-to-day results even using the same operator on the same dyno with ambient conditions being pretty much the same. Each suggested an owner could expect a +/-5% variance if the car was put on the dyno on two or more successive days.

In both cases I was having race cars tuned, so the principal goal wasn't big numbers but instead reliability. A tuner can generally increase power by a decent amount if he sacrifices real-world reliability.

[Scadam]

[QUOTE=nikman011;24045770]i had a stage 1 MP for the drive home (about 10 miles), then applied MPS2, ran that for about a week, switched to HC Performance Stage 2. So, really haven't run it without a tune.

So when you did the dyno was it with or without the tune?

[nikman011]

[QUOTE=Scadam;24046026]

Originally Posted by nikman011

i had a stage 1 MP for the drive home (about 10 miles), then applied MPS2, ran that for about a week, switched to HC Performance Stage 2. So, really haven't run it without a tune.

So when you did the dyno was it with or without the tune?

Dyno was with all MODs, and HCP Stage 2

[ivanj308]

Nickman can you provide more details about the tunes.
MP - Mission Performance - i know there is thread in 3 series with details
HCP - I was not aware that they have a tune for the B58 ? Can you provide details or link to details Price, Power, etc.

[4seriesNL]

Originally Posted by ivanj308

Nickman can you provide more details about the tunes.
MP - Mission Performance - i know there is thread in 3 series with details
HCP - I was not aware that they have a tune for the B58 ? Can you provide details or link to details Price, Power, etc.

Also interested in info.

[nikman011]

Originally Posted by ivanj308

Nickman can you provide more details about the tunes.
MP - Mission Performance - i know there is thread in 3 series with details
HCP - I was not aware that they have a tune for the B58 ? Can you provide details or link to details Price, Power, etc.

Everything you need to know about the MP tune you can find in the 3 series thread, TONs of info in there from a lot of people.
As far as the HCP, this was done locally by a shop in Pittsburgh, TPG Tuning

[nikman011]

Originally Posted by dradernh

NASA has some useful information here regarding percentage differences between dyno types: https://www.nasaproracing.com/forms/...ation_form.pdf. Note also their requirements for tire pressures. I think you can count on wider and softer rubber making your numbers go up, especially if you run them at somewhat lower than normal pressures. The dyno operator can advise you about that - they know how to get the numbers up!

My experience with RWD is that both Dyno Dynamics and Dynapack dynos are ~10% below that of a Dynojet. My East Coast Dynapack tuning was done at Turner Motorsports and on the West Coast at Dinan.

One interesting thing came up at both Turner and Dinan: each dyno operator told me that there was a fair amount of variability in day-to-day results even using the same operator on the same dyno with ambient conditions being pretty much the same. Each suggested an owner could expect a +/-5% variance if the car was put on the dyno on two or more successive days.

In both cases I was having race cars tuned, so the principal goal wasn't big numbers but instead reliability. A tuner can generally increase power by a decent amount if he sacrifices real-world reliability.

Glad to see the NASA docs say to add 10% if using a Mustang Dyno, ....... 🌮🌮🌮

[Eatyolegs]

m235i here. jb4, catless, chargepipe, intercooler, 383hp. Had it on the Dyno today.

[Dj_Quik]

Jb4 map 6 17 psi. My m240 made 390whp and 420wtq on a dyno dynamics at 3000 ft elevation

[kriszty]

Flash tune M240i Xdrive

434PK , 620nm Torque
Wagner downpipe 200 cell
default airfilter

[Scadam]

Pull 1

Pull 2

Pull 3

Final result was 380whp and 440wtq

[AtlasMarbleMeow]

M240 with Remus cat back exhaust and JB4 tune.

[Scadam]

Originally Posted by squirtlem240

M240 with Remus cat back exhaust and JB4 tune.

So 350whp?

[WillOs]

Originally Posted by squirtlem240

M240 with Remus cat back exhaust and JB4 tune.

Was this done at BMR Autowerkes?