Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayaan_f22
Anybody running either the ARC-8 in 19s squared OR the EC-7R in a staggered setup? Please post a picture if possible
|
We unfortunately do not have pictures of either setup. If looking for a 19" ARC-8 fitment, a square 19x8.5" ET35 would likely be the best option. For a staggered EC-7R fitment, you could potentially run the following fitment:
Front: 18x8.5" ET35 with 225/40-18 tires
Rear: 18x9" ET42 with 255/35-18 tires
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AmuroRay
First - any way we can reasonable concavity?
And next, I emailed earlier this week - 18X9 ET 42 F/R with a 12mm spacer is the only way to do a true Square 255 set up, right?
Dual purpose car.
|
If looking for concavity, our Forged ARC-8 and EC-7R are great options as all sizes come in a profile 2 "medium concavity" design. This is the only way to get some concavity on this chassis without fender modifications, narrow tire sizes and a large amount of negative camber.
For a square 255 fitment, that is correct, the 18x9" ET42 with a 12mm front spacer is the best option. Some negative camber will be needed up front to prevent rubbing. Using a 8mm front spacer along with hub extenders can also work depending on the exact tire used. This is a good route if trying to avoid adding negative camber.
-Ian