View Single Post
      05-03-2018, 07:34 PM   #87
///M Power-Belgium
General
///M Power-Belgium's Avatar
Belgium
63366
Rep
24,671
Posts

Drives: ///M3-E92-DCT Silverstone II
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rampant View Post
Facetious much?

A car moving faster and that has just had the front downforce reduced (by the car moving in front of it) has a far reduced maximum braking capacity than the car in front. Racers know this implicitly. Max's double block made the accident inevitable. Daniel's move didn't make the collision inevitable. There was a gap, which according to the rules, should have remained a gap. Max's choice to block was the cause of the collision, not Daniel's speed or direction. He was the victim.

Now tell me that when you're driving down the highway at the speed limit, and another driver moves in front of you, inside your braking distance, going a lot slower, that the ensuing collision is your own fault.

Yours Aye

Mark H
You are right about the reduced downforce . And that was because Daniel was in Max his slipstream . But by the reduced downforce of the slipstream , he had lack of grip from his front tires and his brakes locked up like crazy !
That's why we can see all the smoke from hell coming from his brakes BEFORE the collision , and before he SLIDED into Max.

You guys seem also to forget , that they came from the straight at topspeed and the apex was VERY NEAR (left 90° turn) was only 100 meters in front of them !
This was not the right place , and not the right moment to try something like an overtake !
*IF* Daniel could pass Max . He was not able to make it , at that speed through the left turn .

AMEN !
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion

BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod.

Last edited by ///M Power-Belgium; 05-03-2018 at 07:41 PM..
Appreciate 1
M5Rick60072.50