05-03-2015, 08:21 PM | #23 | |
Major General
651
Rep 5,803
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
F30 330i Alpine white/Coral red Msport 6MT
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 03:47 AM | #24 | ||
Banned
3160
Rep 9,134
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 07:52 AM | #25 |
Captain
106
Rep 855
Posts |
Wow...that big a difference in sport? I never get less than 34 mpg on the highway in my 228i but I keep in in comfort unless I need to merge or pass.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 09:59 AM | #26 |
Major
593
Rep 1,219
Posts
Drives: 2015 M235ix
Join Date: May 2015
Location: United States
|
31 mpg highway in 235
Just back from a 600 mile round trip in my almost new M235ix. Average mpg a bit under 31 at an average speed of 65 mph with the cruise control set to 74 most of the time (9 mph over speed limit) in ECO. This is a bit better than my '02 325i 5-speed has always done. Not bad for a car with almost twice the HP!
FYI: in ECO, if you floor the pedal to pass, the setting will temporarily switch out of ECO and then revert when you ease back, so there is no drawback at all to using ECO all the time on a long highway drive. I have accelerated past 100 mph in this way without realizing it. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 10:04 AM | #27 | |
Captain
166
Rep 860
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 04:26 PM | #28 | |
Major General
890
Rep 7,047
Posts |
Quote:
My 2013 335i with sport AT gets between 25-27mpg in "comfort" trans modes with about 60% highway and 40% in city conditions, with the occasional and required power bursts. I can NOT stand ECO mode. I do run my tire pressures at the highway/sustained high speed PSI, which is around 39psi front and 41psi rear IIRC, so that helps. If conditions allow maybe try upping your tire pressures since she drives a lot of highway miles. Interestingly, I get closer to 25mpg in the winter and 27mpg in warmer climate, and tire pressure plays a role there too as I tend to run lower pressures in winter to get a bit more grip in the frosty conditions. And there is also more "crawling" highway driving in bad conditions around here too. I don't warm my BMW in winter, but it's in richer A/F mixture due to a longer engine warm up period where it will use a bit more fuel. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 04:28 PM | #29 | |
Major General
890
Rep 7,047
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 07:21 PM | #30 |
Private
18
Rep 56
Posts |
So far- average is just over 20mpg with a JB4 stage 2 in city traffic. Always drive in sport mode and always give it hell. That said I couldn't give a rats ass about MPG and would like to know just who in the hell purchased this car because of its fuel sipping nature?
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2015, 07:55 PM | #31 | |
Private First Class
116
Rep 159
Posts |
Quote:
I'll run it in comfort mode on the next tank and see what happens. That's a tremendous difference. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2015, 08:27 AM | #32 |
Captain
106
Rep 855
Posts |
What I have found is sport more does not make that big a difference putting around town but on the highway cruzing it must make a huge difference One caviat is I do have the base with 17 inch wheels, can't imagine it makes that much a difference though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2015, 08:30 AM | #33 | |
Brigadier General
1538
Rep 3,331
Posts |
Quote:
I loved the fact that my F30 could do 0-60 in under 5 seconds and then still get 33mpg on highway trips.
__________________
Current: '20 X5, '18 M3 ZCP
Previous: '11 E90 335i, '11 E90 M3, '16 VW GTI, '15 M235i, '13 335i, '08 TL-S, '00 Corvette |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2015, 08:32 AM | #34 |
Captain
106
Rep 855
Posts |
I don't really know what extra additives are in CA gas. I do know we only have 93 octane gas here and you guys use 91. The gas here has those cleaning additives too, but CA may have some extra stuff.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2015, 08:43 AM | #35 |
Captain
129
Rep 864
Posts |
I have 90-100% city and average 15-17mpg
That said - in comfort, hwy i average 28-32 @ around 70+mph
__________________
Current: 2023 M2
PAST: 2022 Audi E-tron GT, 2021 Lexus LC 500, 2020 Maserati Ghibli S, 2015 M235i, 2014 Audi TTS, 2012 Lexus IS-F, 2009 BMW 135i, 2004 VW GTI |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2015, 04:58 PM | #36 | |
Major General
890
Rep 7,047
Posts |
Quote:
One the 3 series forum it amazes me how many will get the 3.0 turbo engine only to then post that they drive 90% of the time in "eco pro" mode. Whaaaaaa?! I did not buy my 335i Msport for fuel economy, but I am very happy to say that I am greatly impressed with the MPG I do get given all the power this engine puts out. I'm hoping to get about the same MPG from the M235i. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2015, 05:20 PM | #37 |
Captain
166
Rep 860
Posts |
It's for the 10% of the time that we are playing Rodney Race Car Driver. The other 90% of the time we need to save every dime on fuel that we can because we really can't afford the monthly payments :-)
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2015, 08:15 PM | #38 |
Brigadier General
1538
Rep 3,331
Posts |
Or the speeding tickets when you realize you're accidentally doing 110 because you wanted to pass someone going "Slow".
__________________
Current: '20 X5, '18 M3 ZCP
Previous: '11 E90 335i, '11 E90 M3, '16 VW GTI, '15 M235i, '13 335i, '08 TL-S, '00 Corvette |
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2015, 03:34 PM | #39 |
Private
31
Rep 50
Posts |
MPG getting better
Well my MPG is starting to creep up, I track my MPG using this https://www.spritmonitor.de/en/detail/688230.html
I know it is an older site (been using if for 8 years, tough to break old habits). Any ways I hit 29 MPH on my last tank, 50/50 highway and back roads, 100 % Eco Pro (curious to see if it makes a difference) normal driving and half this tank was with the top down I'll do another tank doing the same as above then do a couple of tanks in default (comfort). I know we don't buy these for their MPG (I sure didn't) but the tinkerer in me is curious. Happy Driving ALL AFM |
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2015, 01:26 PM | #40 | |
Major General
890
Rep 7,047
Posts |
Quote:
I can't stand ECO mode. It castrates the cars performance to a frustrating level. In eco mode it feels like the turbo is going out. Eco pro isn't helping me get better MPG, it's just a frustrating mess. Once on the highway all eco does is limit AC compressor run times and HVAC system, along with requiring bigger throttle input for accel if you want to pass. It uses a much lower response throttle along with very quick up shift at lower rpm. All this can be done by the driver but it's packaged and programmed to remove the drivers input in order to maintain its slow settings. Great for those who need it, but not for me. I hate having vehicle responses dulled, especially when I need them. I bought a BMW sport sedan not a 4cyl. Camry. It's not a magic program. I wish I could get an M235i without all those driver "modes". Program the AT to give me the full 8 gears, as it's supposed to, and then just "sport" and "sport+" is all I need. Or, allow us to select the individual parameter settings and store them as a single button recall, or better yet set them to default, that would ideal. Never needed these programs in my E46 or 135i and we all go along just fine. Last edited by RPM90; 05-08-2015 at 01:36 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2015, 01:31 PM | #41 | |
Major General
890
Rep 7,047
Posts |
Quote:
But at the end of that it's MUCH more fun to have the car perform at it's best for best performance. Select proper tire pressures and maintain them, and use the throttle in a more controlled manner and you'll have all the performance at your call when you want it along with great MPG. I don't use eco and still get between 25-27mpg avg. "Hyper mile-ing" was all the rage a few years back. Never interested me. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2015, 03:07 PM | #42 |
Captain
432
Rep 887
Posts
Drives: Enzo F23 228i
Join Date: May 2015
Location: MD, USA
|
Comfort mode I pull 26+ during the week, 70% hwy. This week I used ECO and I pulled 32 for the same commute. Something is working there.
I don't need the turbo or to shift at 4500 to drive on the hwy during traffic. I like having the ECO save my 93 Octane for the back roads where I don't care about mileage! |
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2015, 03:35 PM | #43 | |
First Lieutenant
93
Rep 356
Posts |
Quote:
I was expecting 28 mpg, oh well. It's better than the vehicle I borrowed while I was waiting for my car to come in @ 18-19 mpg (ugh). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2015, 12:58 PM | #44 |
Private
26
Rep 78
Posts |
OK, FYI, looking for the mileage was because I wanted a royal flush, not just a straight flush.... The car is a blast, top up or down. I bought the car with cash, and could have afforded more car, but this car not only spoke to me but seem to hit the sweet spot between performance, comfort, and economy. Two of the 3 legs are awesome, and if one was going to disappoint, I'm glad its the mileage.
__________________
2015 M235i White with Black interior loaded except for DA+ and LSD
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|