THE LARGEST BMW 2-SERIES FORUM ON THE PLANET
2Addicts
2Addicts
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
2Addicts | BMW 2-Series forum BMW 2 Series (F22) Forum BMW 2 Series Coupe and Cabriolet (F22/F23) General Forum Anyone know this owner?

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-15-2017, 10:40 AM   #23
p912guy
Captain
373
Rep
702
Posts

Drives: 2016 M235i Convertible
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ville

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
So this thread has been successfully hijacked with a discussion of crank HP vs wheel HP. Any update on the OP's efforts to possibly take over this lease?
__________________
16 BMW M235i Alpine White Convertible / MT (Daily Driver)
16 Audi Q5 3.0T (Wife's Daily Driver)
66 Porsche 912 (Project)
17 GMC Canyon Denali Long Bed 4x4 (Tailgatin, Haulin & Towin)
various 'one design' sailboats / stinky hockey gear
Appreciate 0
      02-16-2017, 10:18 AM   #24
M235
Private First Class
Canada
28
Rep
147
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Toronto, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
This is waaaaay oversimplified. It's not all good engineering; it's also partially a function of the drivetrain used. For instance: a 911 has less driveline power loss because a RWD rear-engine car doesn't need mechanisms that sap crank power -- driveshafts, extra differentials, etc. -- that a front-engine RWD car requires. It also doesn't need a transfer case because the engine is mounted longitudinally (crankshaft alignment: front to back) instead of transversally (crankshaft: left to right), as is the case with many FWD cars.

Bryan_f22's 15-percent figure is a good one to use for engines mounted on the opposite end of the drive wheels. It can be lower for cars such as RWD 911s or mid-engined cars, or higher for AWD cars. It all depends on the hardware in the way between the crankshaft and the driven rubber because it all robs some power.

But back to the issue: All that's important is to understand where any power figures you come across or need are taken from, then translate them as needed. No one's going to laugh at you ... and if they do, they're not worth your time. Who has time for mod snobs?

Your Right! excuse the over simplification . using porsche was probably not the best example since the engine is right at the back which decreases fly wheel power loss

figures are based on the environment the engine is operating on, many variable need to be taken into consideration...

- coolant/oil temps, air pressure
- air pressure/temp/humidity
- engine temp it self
- fuel type used

all the above can effect engine performance, Im sure i missed out more variables.

Then theres the marketing perspective of things, why say 265hp when you can say 320hp.
Appreciate 0
      02-16-2017, 10:19 AM   #25
M235
Private First Class
Canada
28
Rep
147
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Toronto, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by p912guy View Post
So this thread has been successfully hijacked with a discussion of crank HP vs wheel HP. Any update on the OP's efforts to possibly take over this lease?
.... respectfully hijacked
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.




2addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST