02-24-2015, 06:08 AM | #67 |
Captain
725
Rep 649
Posts |
Agreed I’m far less concerned about drastic weight savings. As a long-time M fan and long time small car fan, I’m primarily looking for the combination of performance, small(ish) form factor and that M pedigree. I was so impressed with the M235i (and tempted to buy) that I know just the slightest re-working by the M division is going to make this car perfect for me. I’m fully expecting that my well-equipped M2 is going to sticker for $65k. If it’s a little less, great! If it’s a bit more then maybe I’ll have to consider the M4.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2015, 06:36 PM | #68 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1032
Rep 1,997
Posts |
Quote:
I think the m2 will be a substantial improvement all things considered, but, on paper, won't blow the m235i away. I think low 50s starting makes sense and a loaded up m2 costing m3/4 money isn't a big deal... almost every segment is like that .. 335i loaded is touching m3 also and yet some people prefer the 335i. a loaded cayman costs more than a base 911 and they still sell. some people would rather step up to the "big brother" but some people really just prefer the "little brother" I really like having 4 doors or I may have waited for the m2.. I can't imagine people not loving it.
__________________
Gone but not forgotten: '09 STi // '08 335i // '02 M3 // '11 335i // '15 M3 // '16 M3 // '16 Camaro SS // '16 Audi S3 // '18 Boxster 718S // '17 Camaro SS 1LE // '16 M6 GC CP
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|