01-08-2018, 03:12 PM | #1 |
Private
20
Rep 51
Posts |
Which gasoline do you use on 228i?
I have been using premium all this time, but I recently noticed it says "89 min" on the door, so was wondering if that was acceptable and if there's any difference, for the engine and performance. Apologies if this has been threaded already.
|
01-08-2018, 03:17 PM | #2 |
Major
598
Rep 1,343
Posts |
Down the rabbit hole we go again!
91 and 89 AKI.... the modern engines are able to cope with either. I'd pay attention to Top Tier fuel providers more. Looking forward to your next post on what engine oil to use. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2018, 07:42 PM | #6 | |
Major
746
Rep 1,247
Posts |
Quote:
The computer will adjust timing to minimize knock. You should only go below 91 octane in an emergency. And don't ever WOT when you don't have 91 in the tank. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2018, 08:51 PM | #7 |
Captain
1657
Rep 922
Posts
Drives: '21 F87 M2C 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: old line state
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2015 MINI Hatch 5-door [0.00]
2021 BMW M2 Competi ... [9.67] 2023 BMW X5 xDrive40i [0.00] 2017 BMW X3 xDrive28i [0.00] |
shell v-power 93 whenever i can get it. have used it in every bimmer I’ve owned.
the price difference between that and mid-grade / 89 is onlylike $250 per year if you fill up once per week. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2018, 07:15 AM | #9 |
Major General
1834
Rep 6,989
Posts
Drives: 15 F80 M3, 22 G01 X3 30i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton, NC
|
Haven't put anything but 93 octane in all my BMWs since 2001. All BMWs have the same fuel requirement, and the "minimum 89" means you can't run "regular" gas, but 89 will be ok in an emergency situation when 91 or 93 isn't available. The difference in cost for a fill-up will be about what you pay for one of those mocha-choca-lava-java coffees at Starbucks.
__________________
2015 F80 ///M3 Sedan 7DCT Tanzanite, 2022 X3 sDrive30i 8AT Brooklyn Grey |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2018, 07:29 AM | #10 |
Colonel
3847
Rep 2,872
Posts |
Top Tier gas is all I'd use, unless I was stuck w/o options (http://www.toptiergas.com/licensedbrands/). I think the car is smart enough that if you use lower octanes, all you get is less boost and lost performance, not detonation holes in pistons - presto! you save $3 a fillup and turn your BMW into a Toyota.
Reminds me I need to run another bottle of Techron through as well. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2018, 03:42 PM | #12 |
Private
20
Rep 51
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2018, 07:20 PM | #14 |
Captain
403
Rep 744
Posts
Drives: 2017 M240i Glacier Silver
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: 19.5mi NNW of Boston, MA
|
If the car says 89 required, 89 is just fine for everyday driving, even at WOT.
AAA has studied this. The efficiency and HP gains are minimal at best: http://newsroom.aaa.com/wp-content/u...rt-FINAL-2.pdf It's interesting to note that an A3, which is probably the closest car in the study to a 2-series, actually had reduced fuel economy with 91 octane vs. 89 octane.
__________________
Fun Cars (daily drivers) 2001-2016: 2001 Honda Prelude | 2016 - present: 2017 M240xi Glacier Silver Coupe
Family Cars: 1993-2014: 1993 Honda Accord 10th Anniversary Edition | 2014-Present: 2014 Honda Odyssey Stable-mate: 2019 - present: 2020 230xi Seaside Blue Convertible |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2018, 09:25 PM | #15 | |
Major
746
Rep 1,247
Posts |
Quote:
"During road testing, the Audi A3 had harsh audible engine knock in road driving using regular gasoline. In real-world driving, this audible knock is the primary decision making factor to select premium gasoline for this vehicle". I would never drive a turbo vehicle hard without having proper fuel in it. Anything under 91 will develop engine knock and can cause SEVERE engine damage. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-10-2018, 07:14 AM | #16 |
Colonel
3847
Rep 2,872
Posts |
This really has been beaten to death in several other threads. Those 'you don't need premium' stories are for the commuter cars, not something making >120hp/liter on turbo. And as noted by Aerostar, there are differences that are not trivial.
"During road testing, the Audi A3 had harsh audible engine knock in road driving using regular gasoline". That audible 'knock' is not just annoying noise, it is putting tremendous unwanted stress on some VERY expensive internals. I'm actually disappointed that Audi allows enough of it to actually be audible - kind of scary (I thought they would just pull boost to prevent this). You probably won't throw a rod from it this weekend, but you will be one of those who wonders "why BMW can't make an engine that lasts more than 60-70k miles". And really, you bought a hi-po euro performance car and now you want to cheap out on a few dollars at the pump? Edit: I waded through the whole report, actually some interesting stuff. You can see how the Audi had to pull boost on regular, vs. NA cars like Miata that show little variation. And almost universal increase in Hp/Tq and mileage w/ premium, just that it is not worth the extra $$. Last edited by Maynard; 01-10-2018 at 10:59 AM.. Reason: additions |
Appreciate
0
|
01-10-2018, 04:40 PM | #18 | |
Major
746
Rep 1,247
Posts |
Quote:
The amount of additional maintenance you'll be doing by saving a few cents using lower octane fuel will vastly outweigh just paying for the 91+ octane. |
|
01-10-2018, 07:48 PM | #19 | |
Captain
403
Rep 744
Posts
Drives: 2017 M240i Glacier Silver
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: 19.5mi NNW of Boston, MA
|
Quote:
For the record, I use 93 the majority of the time, but will use 89 occasionally. One time at a full service station, I found that the attendant filled the car with 87. I think this has happened to others on this forum as well. I drove gingerly and did not have any trouble; I did not try WOT with 87 in the tank.
__________________
Fun Cars (daily drivers) 2001-2016: 2001 Honda Prelude | 2016 - present: 2017 M240xi Glacier Silver Coupe
Family Cars: 1993-2014: 1993 Honda Accord 10th Anniversary Edition | 2014-Present: 2014 Honda Odyssey Stable-mate: 2019 - present: 2020 230xi Seaside Blue Convertible Last edited by harma24; 01-10-2018 at 07:56 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-10-2018, 08:58 PM | #20 | |
Major
746
Rep 1,247
Posts |
Quote:
If you feel there's no difference why are you running 93? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2018, 05:53 PM | #21 | |
Captain
403
Rep 744
Posts
Drives: 2017 M240i Glacier Silver
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: 19.5mi NNW of Boston, MA
|
Quote:
However, the difference in HP is minimal, and as documented in the study, the difference in fuel economy is not enough to cover the higher cost of 93 vs. 87 (I have not done the math to see if the increased gas mileage is enough to justify the difference between 89 & 93). 89 is the minimum for no knock per BMW. That means that in the opinion of BMW engineers the engine is capable of adjusting the timing sufficiently to run on 89 with no risk of damage to the engine. They would not say 89 minimum if it were a risk. Otherwise, they would be opening themselves up to all sorts of warranty claims and potentially lawsuits. So, after all that, why do I run 93 personally? For one, habit. My last car required 91 octane (it did not recommend anything above that, just a minimum). Since I can't get 91 around here, I bought 93. Second, even if the performance gain is minimal (let's just say 1.5% for the sake of argument), I want that 5 extra horsepower! To heck with the extra cost; if I was concerned with saving a few bucks on gas, I'd be driving around in Eco mode!
__________________
Fun Cars (daily drivers) 2001-2016: 2001 Honda Prelude | 2016 - present: 2017 M240xi Glacier Silver Coupe
Family Cars: 1993-2014: 1993 Honda Accord 10th Anniversary Edition | 2014-Present: 2014 Honda Odyssey Stable-mate: 2019 - present: 2020 230xi Seaside Blue Convertible |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2018, 04:51 PM | #22 |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
24137
Rep 190,687
Posts |
93 if available, if not 91
__________________
Check out our current sale by clicking on this link!
https://x-ph.com/sale/ Phone number 702-494-9435 |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|