06-09-2016, 06:38 AM | #133 | |
Major
376
Rep 1,154
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-09-2016, 07:05 AM | #134 |
Private
6
Rep 84
Posts |
Going through this very debate right now.
Past decisions... 2007.....335 vs 328 (I-6).... 335 won - no regrets 2013........x3 3.5 vs x3 2.8....3.5 with no regrets 2013........X1 3.5 vs X1 2.8.....3.5 won but I think that the 4 banger turbo might have been the better choice in this case partly because of the crappy 6 speed auto in the 3.5 and partly because this car feels heavy without the sports package. Now, regarding the 2 series - I love how the 4 cylinder felt in a spirited test drive - it's the anti x3 / X1...refined, yet Light, nimble, enough power without overpowering its chassis. There is something magical less the exhaust/engine sounds the 235 provides. Having driven only the inline 6 turbo for the last 9 years, I'm strongly/strangely considering a 228i With only the 8 speed auto + technology package + THP + LCA mod + LSD with the goal of keeping her as light as possible. Perhaps I should clarify... The car will be for daily commute + auto-X + teaching a new teen to drive....no road trips. By the time I make my decision it will be a 240 vs 230 debate. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-09-2016, 05:16 PM | #135 |
Captain
424
Rep 980
Posts |
lukeeesteve, that sounds like the optimal build for a 228! If you budget for a tune, aftermarket pipes and a peformance suspension, you'll be golden.
__________________
2015 BMW 228i M Sport w/Track Handling Package DAP | Lighting | Premium | Tech DINANTRONICS Performance Tuner Stage 1 | DINAN Shockware | DINAN Free Flow Exhaust | DINAN Performance Spring Set + Ride Quality and Handling Kit |
Appreciate
0
|
06-09-2016, 06:12 PM | #136 |
Ne Plus Ultra
88
Rep 264
Posts
Drives: Portimao Blue 2022 M240iXdrive
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
228 vs M235
My 2016 is currently in the shop with a weird computer problem, so I have been driving a new 228 for the past eight days. The loaner car is pretty much "bare bones", except for the 8sp auto transmission. The things that I miss on the 228 are not the larger engine; the 4 cyl. turbo is a really sweet engine and has plenty of power for everyday driving. What I do miss is the adaptive suspension which is much more compliant in Comfort mode than the standard suspension on the 228. I also miss the larger screen I have with the Nav. both for actual navigation as well as the backup camera and even album art for music. I also miss my Harman Kardon stereo system, even though it has been widely maligned by many on this forum. It definitely sounds better than the standard radio. I haven't had to use the stock brakes in a panic situation, but if I did, I suspect I would miss my Performance Brakes which I had the dealer install. That being said, most of the above equipment can be ordered on a 228, so it is not a compelling reason to buy the M235i. I do like the great balance of the 228 with the lighter engine up front, but the M235i is not exactly unbalanced when it comes to handling. I think BMW did a great job with the 228 and the M235i and, if appropriately equipped according to the owner's wishes, either can be a totally engaging daily driver or occasional track car. No 228 owner should ever have any reason to feel ashamed of their car, especially not the engine!
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 01:35 AM | #137 | |
New Member
8
Rep 26
Posts |
Quote:
In the end, it boils down to how much car is enough for any given person. For me, the 228i is just right. Everyone posting on this forum is likely in the top 1% of wage earners (globally) and is driving a car beyond most people's wildest dreams. In my little world, buying a 228i at $45k was a crazy indulgence. For others, it's a drop in the bucket. For some people, their 2-series is their most valuable possession. For others, their home is worth 30-times what they paid for the car. My philosophy is that if you are going to buy something, make sure you LOVE it, and don't regret it. It's just an effing car, in the end: disposable, recyclable, compostable, or all of the above. |
|
Appreciate
2
|
06-10-2016, 07:40 AM | #138 | |
Major
376
Rep 1,154
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 11:33 AM | #139 | |
Captain
71
Rep 675
Posts
Drives: 2010 128i, manual, sport pkg
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland
|
Quote:
Interesting you mentioned dynamics, but probably you didn't think about dynamics of actually turning the car, in which case the sport suspensions of the lighter car is slightly better. I think you're in denial of how a marketed class hierarchy has formed your view more than what the car actually is.
__________________
2010 128i manual, sport package, performance exhaust, Vorshlag camber plates, Bilstein B6 struts/shocks, 245/40/17 ZIII square on et 40 with rolled rear fenders.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 11:57 AM | #140 | |
Major General
928
Rep 5,538
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 12:13 PM | #141 | |
Captain
71
Rep 675
Posts
Drives: 2010 128i, manual, sport pkg
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland
|
Quote:
__________________
2010 128i manual, sport package, performance exhaust, Vorshlag camber plates, Bilstein B6 struts/shocks, 245/40/17 ZIII square on et 40 with rolled rear fenders.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 08:10 PM | #142 | |
Major
376
Rep 1,154
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 11:03 PM | #143 |
Major
682
Rep 1,017
Posts |
That seems like too much. I didn't pay that much for my M235i.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 11:33 PM | #144 |
Luxury at the redline :)
9105
Rep 7,563
Posts |
I own a 235 and I recently drove a 228i. It was a fully covered loaner car, so was able operate it in a "spirited" manner Honestly, I didn't find was it lacking in the power and handling department; there were more than enough pep that some might even call it fast. I feel like the only thing that directly separates the two cars are the motor. The 228's power had to be rung out the engine, where in the 235 the instant surge of power is just there, at your big toes, just patiently waiting to be unleashed.. Now with that in mind, because of the higher power output of the 235, critical parts such as brake boaster, internal engine parts, suspension geometry, ect are made inherently better and stronger to accommodate the increase strain and power delivery of such car. Minor engineering difference that might not be blatantly obvious to the public and probably could not be quantified but together, when looked at in a complete package, puts the 235 in the "better" category IMHO. Since the 228 could be had with almost any part the 235 have available, it would be asinine to say one is superior than the other.. But we can't deny that the -28 models of BMWs are made, dare I say, at a lower engineered standard to keep its overall cost down compared to the -35s. I know I could probably not get this point across without some -28 owners feeling like I'm ragging on their ride but I will say that both cars are excellent in its own rights and both cater to a different audience, so at the end of the day, if you're contented with your purchase and the price you paid, you win!
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 12:36 AM | #145 |
Enlisted Member
17
Rep 48
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 12:49 AM | #146 |
Luxury at the redline :)
9105
Rep 7,563
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 01:08 AM | #147 |
Enlisted Member
17
Rep 48
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-11-2016, 10:20 AM | #149 |
New Member
8
Rep 26
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 12:39 PM | #150 |
Major General
4656
Rep 6,033
Posts |
The misperceptions and loose use of language seem to be continuing unabated. As a 31 year veteran of this industry, 25 inside a car manufacturer and the rest at suppliers, I'll take another shot at this topic.
Remember the old question about whether a glass is half-full or half-empty? An engineer would point out that it's neither. The glass is simply twice the size it needed to be. If BMW, or any other company, wants to provide an array of products to separate willing buyers from an increasing amount of their money, they need to vary some attributes to attract those who are increasingly interested. So, one model may be faster, quieter, more plush, have more features standard, etc. So, we have "more" of some attributes that some people, but not others, are willing to pay for, but there is no objective measure of "better". It's just more or less of whatever attribute we are measuring. So, then we may have a larger, faster engine. That usually brings increases in mass. And, that cascades through the car with higher capability engine mounts, suspension pieces, brakes, etc. Yes, larger brakes would seem to offer more stopping power, but they may be larger enough just to offset the increased mass they need to stop. Same with a supposedly (but not really) "better" suspension part. It's bigger and heavier because it has to be just to maintain the same level of capability as the smaller lighter one can be in the car with less mass from a lighter engine. The most skilled engineers will design the part to be "right-sized", neither lacking in capacity, nor "over-engineered", wasting cost and weight. So, while a -35 series vehicle may always be faster in a straight line than a -28 series vehicle, there is nothing objectively "better" about the car. The quality and design objectives are the same, the supplier audit standards are the same, the assembly audit standards are the same. One simply has parts which make it go faster and other parts to cope with that difference. All the discussion of the mysterious "tuning" actually turns out just to be developing a capable system of components which support the functional and dynamic objectives of a car with a larger engine versus a similar vehicle with a smaller engine. Neither better, nor worse, just two different jobs to do with two different (and appropriately so) engineering solutions. So, one more time, can those who are desperately seeking to attach themselves to something "better" please just give it up? You are on a fruitless mission of ego-support, but on a foundation of air. Buy what pleases you, comfort yourself with the thought, "This is better for me!", and the car companies, such as the one I toiled at for my career, will be pleased to exchange your dollars for the privilege. I guess the superiority fantasy comes along for free, if you are so inclined, but it really is not logically defensible.
__________________
2015 228i 6MT/Track Handling/Tech/Cold/Premium/Lighting/Driver Assistance/KCDesign Strut Brace/M2 LCAs/Rogue SSK/BBS SR/PS4S/ER Chargepipe/AA Intercooler/Dinan Shockware/MPerformance Spoiler/Black Grilles/Xpel Ultimate PPF & Prime XR+ Tint/Adam's Ceramic/no CDV
2024 X3 sDrive30i/MSport/Premium/Dynamic Handling/Shadowline/Parking/Xpel Prime XR Plus/Weathertech Cargo Liner |
Appreciate
3
|
06-11-2016, 06:23 PM | #151 |
Major
376
Rep 1,154
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 08:12 PM | #152 |
Luxury at the redline :)
9105
Rep 7,563
Posts |
This would not even be a discussion if the few eunuchs on this forum would of just spent the extra money and spring for a 235 or even an M2, if possible.. :: These cars are made more performance oriented, where as the 228 is made with more efficiency and cost cutting considerations.. That's why they use the -28s for loaners cars, women drivers, or former Corolla S-owners..
When your wife told you that size doesn't matter, she was just not trying to hurt your feelings - shake off the denial and get yourself the bigger motor - it matters!! Get the 235! |
Appreciate
2
|
06-11-2016, 09:13 PM | #153 |
NewFinishColumbia/detailer
604
Rep 2,096
Posts |
Lots of hot air in this thread. Buy what makes you happy. Who cares if someone thinks their car is "better" than yours.
__________________
328 F31 xDrive/OSM/Venetian Luxury Line/Cold Weather/Premium/Driving Assist/Nav/Tech "Golden Goose"
78' Honda CB400A project http://www.instagram.com/steve_inf31 |
Appreciate
1
|
06-11-2016, 09:26 PM | #154 |
Enlisted Member
17
Rep 48
Posts |
|
Appreciate
2
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|