[N55guy]

Thought I'd share this, I figure this might help someone out. Sorry no bone stock dyno, I wish I had one too but the mod bug bit hard early. Did the next best thing and did one with the stock performance map (map 4). All done in 4th gear.

1st pull map 2 356whp 403wtq
2nd pull map 2 365whp 392wtq
3rd pull map 4 325whp 343wtq

Mod list:
jb4 stage 2
VRSF chargepipe
VRSF DP
VRSF FMIC
Fabspeed muffler bypass
K&N drop in filter
BMS connect kit
Dinan springs/bump stops
M performance front lip
M performance rear carbon fiber spoiler
M performance rear diffuser
M3 style carbon fiber mirrors
VMR wheels

[Shayan55]

Great numbers man! theres a good bump from the stock map!
What fuel were you on?

[N55guy]

Originally Posted by f22_shayan

Great numbers man! theres a good bump from the stock map!
What fuel were you on?

93

What you ended up with 91 makes me want BM3 and getting my top speed limiter removed would be a bonus!

[Shayan55]

Originally Posted by N55guy

93

What you ended up with 91 makes me want BM3 and getting my top speed limiter removed would be a bonus!

Haha must be nice shit i wish i had 93 lmao. And yea i mean bm3 is great man haha why not look into bm3 with a BEF?

[bryan_G01]

wish ppl would keep settings the same ie: STD smoothing 5.

[XutvJet]

Nice numbers. Very consistent with what others have seen with the JB4 and DP as the power mods, 93 octane, and runs done on a Dynojet. The Map 4 numbers are also spot on for a stock map, 93 octane, and DP. Nice.

If you would have dynoed in 5th, you'd probably see about 1-2% higher numbers..... if total numbers are that big of a deal to you. IMO, 4th on the 6MT is a good choice though as it keeps heat soak in check.

[Mr Carrots]

Nice, I need to get my JB4/downpipe m240i dyno'd to get a real comparison, cant find any xdrive dynos of my build.

400 wtq must feel nice

[RI235]

I don't get it. I have similar mods and barely walked away from a stock M235.....

[Jeff@TopGearSolutions]

Originally Posted by RI235

I don't get it. I have similar mods and barely walked away from a stock M235.....

Which mods differ?

Both MT or AT?

[RI235]

Originally Posted by Jeff@TopGearSolutions

Which mods differ?

Both MT or AT?

Well I've only got the VRSF Catless DP and JB4 Map 2 running 93 Octane. It was an aT Xdrive versus a bone stock AT Xdrive.

[B58togo]

Originally Posted by bryan_f22

wish ppl would keep settings the same ie: STD smoothing 5.

Just multiply SAE by 1.03-1.04 and you have your rough STD numbers. SAE is the gold standard. Any respectable automotive publication will only publish SAE. Dyno operators like to use the higher reading STD numbers to "wow" their customers.

[N55guy]

Originally Posted by f22_shayan

Haha must be nice shit i wish i had 93 lmao. And yea i mean bm3 is great man haha why not look into bm3 with a BEF?

That's my plan

[N55guy]

Gotta admit the AFR freaks me out on this car. When I saw 15s in the dyno sheet I thought that was at redline. Did some logging after that to see exactly where they're at, saw 15ish at low rpms tapering down to 12.9 at redline. I'm not a tuning guru but I understood that to mean the car is running pretty lean. Trying to get these logs posted so people that know what they're talking about can review em.

[amw896]

Originally Posted by N55guy

Gotta admit the AFR freaks me out on this car. When I saw 15s in the dyno sheet I thought that was at redline. Did some logging after that to see exactly where they're at, saw 15ish at low rpms tapering down to 12.9 at redline. I'm not a tuning guru but I understood that to mean the car is running pretty lean. Trying to get these logs posted so people that know what they're talking about can review em.

Other way. Lower number means you're running rich. 12.9 at redline is good.

13:1 rich
14.7:1 stoic
15:1 and higher is lean

[N55guy]

Originally Posted by amw896

Other way. Lower number means you're running rich. 12.9 at redline is good.

13:1 rich
14.7:1 stoic
15:1 and higher is lean

I meant the 15 being lean and scaring me when I first saw it. AFRs didn't get to 13 til 5.5k though, like I said I'm no guru so maybe you can school me a bit, all good. I'd be greatly appreciated!

[amw896]

Originally Posted by N55guy

I meant the 15 being lean and scaring me when I first saw it. AFRs didn't get to 13 til 5.5k though, like I said I'm no guru so maybe you can school me a bit, all good. I'd be greatly appreciated!

Oh, right on! Yea, I think you're ok. I regularly monitor with an obd port and find the car is very good at running in the stoic zone. Unless I start hammering it, then it runs rich as eff! Yours looks good as well.

[mike@x-ph.com]

Thank you for sharing

Stock map is probably 10 HP less than map 4 since you already have high downpipes

[Schultz28]

Nice!! Would love to see your numbers with some e85 added!!

[DragonGate]

Originally Posted by Schultz28

Nice!! Would love to see your numbers with some e85 added!!

+1
Manual cars should be Dyno in 5th gear ; + STD CF

[XutvJet]

STD correction factor isn't right unless you want to inflate the numbers by about 4% and feel better about yourself. The industry standard is SAE.

As for dynoing in 5th, that too would increase the numbers a percent or so as well. Dynoing in 4th is fine and helps keeps the motor from heat soaking on back to back runs.

[N55guy]

Originally Posted by Gong

+1
Manual cars should be Dyno in 5th gear ; + STD CF

I agree with @XutvJet

But it's not possible for me to dyno in 5th anyway, my top speed limiter is at 130. I'll flash eventually but for now I'm just sticking to tracks where I don't need to go past 130.

[Dylan86]

Originally Posted by N55guy

Gotta admit the AFR freaks me out on this car. When I saw 15s in the dyno sheet I thought that was at redline. Did some logging after that to see exactly where they're at, saw 15ish at low rpms tapering down to 12.9 at redline. I'm not a tuning guru but I understood that to mean the car is running pretty lean. Trying to get these logs posted so people that know what they're talking about can review em.

These cars do run lean, imo. But I think a lot of the newer DI engines operate this way. With the JB4 setup, I find it starts in the high 14's and tapers to mid-high 12's, which from what I've researched, is safe for DI engines.. Scary because when I had big turbo cars in the past, we never liked dipping into the 12's, mind you they weren't DI..

Would love to hear more from one of the local 2addicts tuners, on the whole AFR gig.