05-27-2015, 03:40 PM | #156 |
Second Lieutenant
9
Rep 270
Posts |
What's that other BMW at 1:00. Looks like its pulling away from the M2 and it sounds pretty damn good for a non-M car. New 5 series?
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 03:47 PM | #157 |
Major General
3221
Rep 6,218
Posts |
M2 looks great though - even it won't be much nimbler than the m4 due to the weight, I will find it easier to place just because it is smaller.
Also I will love the fact that the interior is compact and tight. The only thing that worries me is turbo lag. It has all the M4 essentials but it doesn't have the "let's try to get rid of as much turbo lag as possible" technology - am I correct? Even with it the lag is there - it will definitely be there without it. That would just suck. If this car is as fast as an e9x m3 on track it is totally worth it - tune and it will be pretty damn fast. I can't keep up with my buddy's 135i with a tune on the straights in my e9x m3. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 03:58 PM | #158 | |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
The 1M already is " as fast as an e9x " on track. Surprised all that " turbo lag" doesn't have you blowing by that 135 .. Oh wait... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 04:01 PM | #159 | |
Major General
3221
Rep 6,218
Posts |
Quote:
On a roval track the 1M was not that fast. Well it's probably a drivers race but on the front straight I was lifting so I wouldn't crash into it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 04:03 PM | #160 | ||
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
FYI a 135 with a tune has the same power as the 1m... ( the 1M has better suspension and the same exact diff as the E90).. so..... yes.. it sounds like your driver's race with a 1M would be just that. Lap times for both cars are available if you look around... note that the 1M on a damp track was quicker than E90 in dry here.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ower_Lap_Times As always.. different courses will show different strengths... Back to the M2... YES.. it will be quicker than the 1M and E9x M3... I haven't seen a generation change with a new model M3/M4 SLOWER yet. Heavier and less nimble.. but always more power and usually better handling and faster overall. Last edited by M3 Adjuster; 05-27-2015 at 04:52 PM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 04:15 PM | #161 | |
Major General
3221
Rep 6,218
Posts |
Quote:
with...upgraded turbos, kw clubsport suspension, etc. Last edited by M3 Number 86; 05-27-2015 at 04:40 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-27-2015, 04:47 PM | #162 |
Moderator
29375
Rep 13,097
Posts |
That ain't no 135i. That's an airplane.
__________________
///M is art ↔ Artemis
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 04:59 PM | #163 | |
Captain
1329
Rep 691
Posts |
Quote:
This is such a silly comment. First of all, trucks are not determined by the length. Trucks come in all kinds of sizes. Second, that Transit is a compact van that is based on the Ford Focus. So why don't you compare E30 M3 to the 90s 4Runner and Escort van? E30 M3 - 171" Escort van - 164.6" N60 4Runner - 174.6" Following your logic, E30 M3 is also a truck. But lets dig even further. Japan builds Kei trucks which are now limited to 134". Back in the E30 M3 days, they were even smaller. Honda Acty was less than 130" long. Guess that makes an E30 M3 a monster truck in Japan. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-27-2015, 05:09 PM | #165 | ||
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
thanks for using the way back machine. It wasn't really needed because we aren't really referring to 90s vehicle other than to illustrate how the M3 has grown over time. For reference, my 1M is the exact same length as the ORIGINAL M3 , The vehicle that started this all. Unfortunately the M3 has plumped up from a boy racer sedan to a what is now a 90s M5. For sure its refined, but it's chubbier and much longer and indeed far less nimble. Size is indeed relative ! And that is exactly my point. The M3/m4 are truck sized **when compared to e30/e82 as well as the M2 **. ( dimensions not yet released). Thanks for agreeing! Many of us want a vehicle that is the size of the original M3. I don't need an extra 14" of vehicle in my garage, on track, or when changing lanes in my commute. Not sure why this is hard to comprehend for some.. The current M3 and M4 are awesome vehicles but are nowhere near the same vehicle as the original. The 1M recaptured some of the spirit of the E30M3 and it looks like the M2 is a great successor to the 1M. Now ... If only BMW would give us an e36m3 sized sedan in the form of an M2 GRAN COUPE.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 06:29 PM | #166 |
General
2038
Rep 25,989
Posts |
Oooh, exciting!
__________________
VMR|Wheels | 714.442.7916 |
sales@velocitymotoring.com | www.velocitymotoring.com | facebook | flickr | Instagram |
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2015, 11:03 PM | #167 | |
Lieutenant
189
Rep 537
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2015, 08:48 AM | #170 | |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,402
Posts |
Quote:
Doesn't take more than a tune/intake, or tune/dp to keep up with a stock E90 M3...not that I wouldn't rather have the S65, or the 1M for that matter. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-28-2015, 08:49 AM | #171 |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,402
Posts |
While I won't say a 1 series is anything but odd looking, am I the only one who finds the 2 series almost too bland? At least the 1er is...ummm..."interesting".
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2015, 09:48 AM | #172 | ||
Banned
1130
Rep 4,686
Posts
Drives: L'Orange
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
|
Quote:
I'm not just saying this as an owner....but as someone who lusted after one for a few years prior to getting one. Whenever I saw one before that, I was in awe of the way it looked....I still feel that way every time I walk into the garage. If you think a standard 3-series is great looking then you probably won't understand...but if you really appreciate interesting design like the 2002 Turbo then you will probably get it. The M2 looks like it will be a waaaaay better looking car than the frankly weak looking 235...but I'm not sure it will have the aggression and madness of the 1M; we will see!! |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2015, 10:58 AM | #173 |
Enlisted Member
11
Rep 40
Posts |
I was just thinking the same thing. M2 just looks like a bloated 235 series and boring IMO. The wide wheel wells on the M2 just are not exciting enough. I'm hoping they are still working on the wheel well flare design and can put some more distinct design into the wide body look. Honestly, just slap on the wheel well panels from the 1M and done!
Last edited by stuckinoc; 05-28-2015 at 11:10 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2015, 11:00 AM | #174 | |
Colonel
701
Rep 2,337
Posts |
Quote:
I like the 1M. I think it's a good looking car, but how many pages of bullcrap are you guys going to spew over the looks of the 1M? It's based on the e82, which is a frumpy looking car, at best. The 1M is an ugly chick with an amazing makeover.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2015, 11:20 AM | #175 | ||
General
17488
Rep 25,113
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
My car made front page of Bimmerpost
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2015, 11:55 AM | #176 | ||
Lieutenant
79
Rep 401
Posts |
Quote:
To each his own? That's okay right? Not every person who likes it is compensating lol. ANYWAYS, can't wait to hear this M2 in person! |
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|