THE LARGEST BMW 2-SERIES FORUM ON THE PLANET
2Addicts
2Addicts
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
2Addicts | BMW 2-Series forum Technical Topics N55 (M235i) Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Tuning JB4 MAP2&5 lost power compared to JB1 (BMS Stage 1)

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-11-2016, 11:00 AM   #1
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

JB4 MAP2&5 lost power compared to JB1 (BMS Stage 1)

M235i 8sp. Mods: Wagner sport cat DP, Wagner intercooler, charge pipe and MPE.

JB1 made 338 wheel HP on a mainline dyno in Australia. Ran 12.55 @ 111MPH.

JB4 map 2 made 328 wheel HP on a different mainline dyno. Did 12.65 @ 109MPH. No dyno run with map 5 but it did 12.66 @ 108MPH on the drag strip.

Only one type of fuel used for all of the above - standard 98RON which is about 93 octane in the US.

Appreciate 0
      05-11-2016, 01:44 PM   #2
XutvJet
Major General
5549
Rep
5,369
Posts

Drives: 2011 Cayman Base, 2016 M235
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Kansas City

iTrader: (-1)

Same tracks? Same density altitude conditions? Different 60 foots? We need to understand the variables first.

Comparing numbers between different dynos isn't going to work. They'll be a variance between even the same make dynos. A dyno is simply a tuning tool and you should use the same one and the same gear when comparing numbers.
Appreciate 0
      05-11-2016, 01:46 PM   #3
zipphreak
Captain
No_Country
454
Rep
986
Posts

Drives: m235xi
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: b00ty

iTrader: (2)

Best to go here;
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16

Grab a couple of 4th gear runs through the RPM with the JB4 interface connected and logging on... You will get someone smart to review the logs and point out issues

Even different brands spit out vastly different numbers. I guarantee different dyno's of the same brand have different variances of calibrations.

Run multiple dynos with adequate cool downs between stage1, stage2 map 2 map5 etc with the same tuner/dyno..
Appreciate 0
      05-12-2016, 12:08 AM   #4
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by XutvJet View Post
Same tracks? Same density altitude conditions? Different 60 foots? We need to understand the variables first.

Comparing numbers between different dynos isn't going to work. They'll be a variance between even the same make dynos. A dyno is simply a tuning tool and you should use the same one and the same gear when comparing numbers.
Yes same track. Jb1 runs had 20 degree C temp. Jb4 runs were around 16 degree C.

1.97 60ft with the 12.55 JB1 run.
2.05 60ft with the 12.65 JB4 map 2 run.

Agree with the dyno variations, thats why I took the car to the same drag strip to see the MPH. In any case, even if I got a worse 60ft with the JB4, the MPH should at least equivalent or higher than what JB1 (with less boost) achieved.
Appreciate 0
      05-12-2016, 12:10 AM   #5
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipphreak View Post
Best to go here;
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16

Grab a couple of 4th gear runs through the RPM with the JB4 interface connected and logging on... You will get someone smart to review the logs and point out issues

Even different brands spit out vastly different numbers. I guarantee different dyno's of the same brand have different variances of calibrations.

Run multiple dynos with adequate cool downs between stage1, stage2 map 2 map5 etc with the same tuner/dyno..
Yes that's what I'd like to do but don't have the logging gear. I'm speaking to the shop who supplied the JB4 to see if they can log it for me.
Appreciate 0
      05-12-2016, 05:36 AM   #6
zipphreak
Captain
No_Country
454
Rep
986
Posts

Drives: m235xi
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: b00ty

iTrader: (2)

It's just a USB cable and laptop, you don't need the bluetooth connect kit to log.. Buy the $35 USB cable, hopefully you have a windows laptop.

http://www.burgertuning.com/USB_Cable_Extension.html
Appreciate 0
      05-12-2016, 04:00 PM   #7
mike@x-ph.com
Joint Chiefs of Staff
mike@x-ph.com's Avatar
United_States
24132
Rep
190,687
Posts

Drives: 07-335/12-328/18-M4/21-M4CP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Las Vegas

iTrader: (23)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Straight6Driver View Post
M235i 8sp. Mods: Wagner sport cat DP, Wagner intercooler, charge pipe and MPE.

JB1 made 338 wheel HP on a mainline dyno in Australia. Ran 12.55 @ 111MPH.

JB4 map 2 made 328 wheel HP on a different mainline dyno. Did 12.65 @ 109MPH. No dyno run with map 5 but it did 12.66 @ 108MPH on the drag strip.

Only one type of fuel used for all of the above - standard 98RON which is about 93 octane in the US.

first the dyno comparison does not indicate anything since you used 2 different dynos

track times vary depending on lots of things including conditions, temps,etc

Map 5 boost values are variable so it is not a good map to use when comparing power.

Lastly, do couple logs and make sure everything is okay... No timing drops, throttle closure, etc...
__________________
Check out our current sale by clicking on this link!
https://x-ph.com/sale/

Phone number 702-494-9435
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2016, 11:34 AM   #8
turbocake
Private
11
Rep
63
Posts

Drives: 16 m235i xdrive
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Reno

iTrader: (0)

Having come from owning and tuning many different cars over the years. While disappointing, the results you are seeing are non-conclusive at best. You would need to do pulls on the same dyno, on the same day, within minutes of each other and confirm throughout the pull that IATs and air density is the same pull to pull. I agree that you should get some logs, and also confirm that you are switching to the maps you think you are.
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2016, 01:34 PM   #9
Jeff@TopGearSolutions
Jeff@TopGearSolutions's Avatar
United_States
3441
Rep
79,212
Posts

Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com

iTrader: (37)

Unfortunately I have to agree with the majority here. The data isn't controlled.

Even on a track there are too many factors, Launch, DA, Ambients, Humidity, Heat soak, ETC

Jb4 has the capability to be faster, more mods, more octane.

Logging is a must if you want to find where your vehicle needs improvement, IE IAT.
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2016, 07:55 PM   #10
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Still haven't had the chance to log because the shop has been busy, but they did find out that they were misinformed about my JB4 do not need EWG wiring. They supplied my JB4 with FF wire but no EWG wire.

I was told for any map higher than map 1 JB4 will need EWG wiring to hit target boost? Is this true?

They said this was why I lost 2 mph at the drags strip compared to JB1, even though it was on a cooler ambient temp condition.
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2016, 08:06 PM   #11
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff@TopGearSolutions View Post
Unfortunately I have to agree with the majority here. The data isn't controlled.

Even on a track there are too many factors, Launch, DA, Ambients, Humidity, Heat soak, ETC

Jb4 has the capability to be faster, more mods, more octane.

Logging is a must if you want to find where your vehicle needs improvement, IE IAT.
I agree with JB4 has the capability to be faster, which was why I decided to upgrade in the first place.

Everyone says dyno is not the best comparison tool, only way to see if there's considerable gain is MPH from the drag strip. And that's exactly what I did.

Conditions were controlled to the best of my ability - same track, same tires, same tire pressure, same launch RPM, even the same lane. The evening which JB4 was tested the ambient temp was lower by 4 degrees. You do the math. Tell me if I missed anything as far as controlled drag strip testing is concerned.
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2016, 08:13 PM   #12
Bakks
Enlisted Member
10
Rep
49
Posts

Drives: BMW M135i
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Perth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Straight6Driver View Post
Still haven't had the chance to log because the shop has been busy, but they did find out that they were misinformed about my JB4 do not need EWG wiring. They supplied my JB4 with FF wire but no EWG wire.

I was told for any map higher than map 1 JB4 will need EWG wiring to hit target boost? Is this true?

They said this was why I lost 2 mph at the drags strip compared to JB1, even though it was on a cooler ambient temp condition.
EWG wiring is not used for map 1 or 2, but it is in map 5.
Appreciate 1
      05-22-2016, 09:57 PM   #13
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakks View Post
EWG wiring is not used for map 1 or 2, but it is in map 5.
Oh my shop seems to be under the impression map 2 as well since it's now a adaptive map
Appreciate 0
      05-23-2016, 05:25 AM   #14
Bee Pee
Brigadier General
Bee Pee's Avatar
United Kingdom
1776
Rep
4,512
Posts

Drives: AW M2 DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SW London

iTrader: (3)

S6 Driver,

Maps 1 and 2 are additive maps with partial adaption capability during a short intial learning phase. EWG direct control is inactive for both these maps.

Direct EWG control is active for all absolute maps ie 3, 5, 6 and 7 - all of which are designed to give higher boost safely than maps 1 and 2. You could run map 5 without EWG hooked up but may not get the same gains as with say map 2.

When EWG is hooked and active - you have to have FF wired in to allow JB4 to directly monitor/control fuel trims and AFR.

BP
__________________
Fettled M135i EB AT then AW M2 DCT - both gone but not forgotten:

Current '22 X3M LCI..
Appreciate 0
      05-23-2016, 07:04 AM   #15
leeadam
Major
leeadam's Avatar
United Kingdom
468
Rep
1,151
Posts

Drives: F90 M5 Comp (Evolve Tune)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Buckinghamshire, England

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Straight6Driver View Post
M235i 8sp. Mods: Wagner sport cat DP, Wagner intercooler, charge pipe and MPE.

JB1 made 338 wheel HP on a mainline dyno in Australia. Ran 12.55 @ 111MPH.

JB4 map 2 made 328 wheel HP on a different mainline dyno. Did 12.65 @ 109MPH. No dyno run with map 5 but it did 12.66 @ 108MPH on the drag strip.

Only one type of fuel used for all of the above - standard 98RON which is about 93 octane in the US.

with your JB1 figures at 338 at wheel what do you recon its putting out at flywheel?
Appreciate 0
      05-23-2016, 07:48 AM   #16
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bee Pee View Post
S6 Driver,

Maps 1 and 2 are additive maps with partial adaption capability during a short intial learning phase. EWG direct control is inactive for both these maps.

Direct EWG control is active for all absolute maps ie 3, 5, 6 and 7 - all of which are designed to give higher boost safely than maps 1 and 2. You could run map 5 without EWG hooked up but may not get the same gains as with say map 2.

When EWG is hooked and active - you have to have FF wired in to allow JB4 to directly monitor/control fuel trims and AFR.

BP
Thanks for the clarification BP. They have ordered the EWG wire for me, can't wait to see the difference it makes. At the moment I couldn't feel much difference between map 2 and map 5, the similar MPH at the drags reflects this.
Appreciate 0
      05-23-2016, 07:50 AM   #17
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by leeadam View Post
with your JB1 figures at 338 at wheel what do you recon its putting out at flywheel?
No idea. Do you have a formula for that? It did get 111MPH at the strip and thats a more convincing data than any dyno figures.
Appreciate 0
      05-23-2016, 08:10 AM   #18
leeadam
Major
leeadam's Avatar
United Kingdom
468
Rep
1,151
Posts

Drives: F90 M5 Comp (Evolve Tune)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Buckinghamshire, England

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Straight6Driver View Post
No idea. Do you have a formula for that? It did get 111MPH at the strip and thats a more convincing data than any dyno figures.
I never know what the formula is, some say 25% some say 15%...and i realise dynos all different, and many things affect it, just interested to know what it may be...i guess around 360 bhp ish. quite good
Appreciate 0
      05-23-2016, 08:28 PM   #19
Straight6Driver
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by leeadam View Post
I never know what the formula is, some say 25% some say 15%...and i realise dynos all different, and many things affect it, just interested to know what it may be...i guess around 360 bhp ish. quite good
Yeah I think 360hp at the crank is a pretty good guesstimate. There's website where you can work out the HP based on weight and MPH from the 1/4 mile strip, and vice versa.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.




2addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST