09-18-2014, 02:47 PM | #1 |
Enlisted Member
9
Rep 35
Posts |
M235i dyno and Track results - 115mph
First I would like to thank M.R. Performance in Westbury, NY for all the help in installing and getting down to the track. I would also like to thank Terry for a great product and dealing with my emails back and forth. Now for the car:
2014 M235i RWD 8 speed Auto JB4 with Flex Fuel wires and EWG wires - runs on Map 7 with 2 gallons E85 to full tank. VRSF ******** Wheels stock Tires Stock Run Flats - biggest thing holding car back stock charger pipe Results using Mustang Dyno (about 12% less then DynoJet): Stock run: 309hp / 340 tq Map 7: 368hp / 444tq Map 6 was tested but was inconsistent with boost spike and fuel pumps struggling so for now will wait until meth is added. I can say there is room for power increase though. Track results: Again the run flats are the weakest link here but see the attached time slips. We were able to keep increasing MPH with each run, but wheel spin was a killer. Also forgot to give a 2nd gear launch a try. 12.4 at 115 mph though is looking good. Time slips attached Please follow and I will update with more results and future plans. Last edited by bmwn55tuner; 09-18-2014 at 04:07 PM.. |
09-18-2014, 03:06 PM | #3 |
Major
256
Rep 1,040
Posts |
59 more HP and 104 more torque for probably under $1500 in parts is fantastic! If you do a lot of the E85 mix and Map 7, or switch to Map 6 with Meth you might want to invest in a new charge pipe before you have replace the blown stock one
Did you get interval trap speeds from your run you can post up. Like to see your run from start to finish. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 03:55 PM | #4 |
Enlisted Member
9
Rep 35
Posts |
Yea the time slips should show 1/8 and 1000 foot. I will be doing the chargepipe and meth next before playing around with map 6 and even beating on map 7 much more.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 03:58 PM | #5 |
Colonel
701
Rep 2,337
Posts |
Sounds like this will easily put your head back into the seat with that much torque. I can't see the attachments, but it would be cool to see the torque curve.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:15 PM | #7 |
Captain
413
Rep 678
Posts |
Very inpressive. Awesome bang for your buck gains over stock. Some good sticky tires would be pretty damn interesting.
__________________
2022 M4 Comp X 2021 M440ix - Sold 2015 M235 - Sold |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 08:17 PM | #13 |
Major General
1403
Rep 5,262
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 08:35 PM | #14 | |
Captain
183
Rep 926
Posts |
Stock run 309 on a MUSTANG DYNO..wow I'm seeing most dyno well under 300 on a dynojet. What fuel were you running?
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 08:46 PM | #15 |
What goes here?
452
Rep 1,356
Posts
Drives: 2019 G30 M550i
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida Space Coast
iTrader: (4)
Garage List 2019 BMW M550i [0.00]
2021 BMW M3 Competi ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M5 Competi ... [0.00] 2016 BMW M3 [0.00] 2014 BMW M235i [0.00] |
nice end results but you are saying that the Mustang reads 12% lower... which would put you at 346hp at the wheels, stock.. that did NOT happen.
also, was the 'stock' dyno run with the downpipe installed or was that tested on a different day? if so, the comparison is a bit skewed due to different run conditions.
__________________
2019 G30 M550i
GBNF: 2021 G80 M3, 2019 F90 M5 Competition, 2016 F80 M3, 2014 F22 M235i |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 08:58 PM | #16 |
Enlisted Member
9
Rep 35
Posts |
304 hp was with car completely stock.. and roughly 12% will be comparing on a dyno get in the future more or less looking at numbers and difference from upgrade to upgrade. So far not disappointing.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2014, 03:08 AM | #17 |
Private First Class
34
Rep 171
Posts |
It would be best if you keep going to the same dyno you measured your car with stock to see power gains with different mods. Not saying don't dyno on a dynojet but you have a baseline dyno of your car stock on a particular dyno so that is the best one to keep using for the upgrade to upgrade measurements imo....
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2014, 06:48 AM | #18 |
Private First Class
6
Rep 100
Posts |
Dayum!
Nice to see other track times too. That is 418/500 on a Dyno jet if you use 12%. I made 403/450 with similar mod on E30 and have run a best of 12.35@114 with slightly better 60 ft in 1300 ft DA. 12.39@112 in 3000 ft so car does not seem to be affected by DA much at least ET wise. What was the DA? Thinking about catless down pipe and sticky tires to try and get a 11 sec pass but afraid of breaking something if the tires hook too well. -my 800 rwhp M6 mustang just snapped by "Unbreakable"CF drive shaft(rated to 900 Hp lol) in half with slicks. Last edited by olaosunt; 09-19-2014 at 06:56 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2014, 07:39 AM | #19 |
Captain
183
Rep 926
Posts |
What's a M6 Mustang?
btw you are running 920hp (at the crank) was there fine print on the drive shaft Quote:
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2014, 08:41 AM | #20 |
Private First Class
6
Rep 100
Posts |
Car is a 2012 with a built MT82,6 speed tranny,dual disc RXT clutch,Detroit tru trac,welded /braced axle tubes/moser axles.Guess it still found the weakest link!lol
This is the second one that has failed! I am done with shifting and breaking parts so doing an autoswap in next couple of weeks.Car will ET a whole second faster! Apologies to OP ,not trying to hijack your thread. Please keep us updated. Is there a M235 timeslip thread yet? |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2015, 10:54 AM | #22 |
Lieutenant
377
Rep 596
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|