02-15-2017, 10:40 AM | #23 |
Captain
373
Rep 702
Posts
Drives: 2016 M235i Convertible
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ville
|
So this thread has been successfully hijacked with a discussion of crank HP vs wheel HP. Any update on the OP's efforts to possibly take over this lease?
__________________
16 BMW M235i Alpine White Convertible / MT (Daily Driver)
16 Audi Q5 3.0T (Wife's Daily Driver) 66 Porsche 912 (Project) 17 GMC Canyon Denali Long Bed 4x4 (Tailgatin, Haulin & Towin) various 'one design' sailboats / stinky hockey gear |
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2017, 10:18 AM | #24 | |
Private First Class
28
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
Your Right! excuse the over simplification . using porsche was probably not the best example since the engine is right at the back which decreases fly wheel power loss figures are based on the environment the engine is operating on, many variable need to be taken into consideration... - coolant/oil temps, air pressure - air pressure/temp/humidity - engine temp it self - fuel type used all the above can effect engine performance, Im sure i missed out more variables. Then theres the marketing perspective of things, why say 265hp when you can say 320hp. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2017, 10:19 AM | #25 |
Private First Class
28
Rep 147
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|