BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
M2 Technical Topics > N55 Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust / Bolt-ons / Tuning > 360PS X4 M40i leaked - M2 engine specs I guess?

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-03-2015, 10:31 AM   #221
PackPride85
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
1120
Rep
1,644
Posts

Drives: M2
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NC

iTrader: (0)

BMW refers to both their single scroll dual turbo and twin scroll single turbo as "TwinPower" technology.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 10:46 AM   #222
hyperzulu
Colonel
hyperzulu's Avatar
United_States
701
Rep
2,337
Posts

Drives: 2015 M235i
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Adjuster View Post
This is why the 1M was twin turbo and the n55 went into to rest of the lineup except the "is limited edition 335/135/z435..
Pretty sure the z4 and 335 -is models got the n54 with slightly different tuning (z4 same hp as 1m). The 135is got the n55 with mppk and dct though.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 10:57 AM   #223
metrickid
Dinosaur supervisor
metrickid's Avatar
Netherlands
3030
Rep
4,214
Posts

Drives: E91 318d
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Autobahn

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PackPride85 View Post
BMW refers to both their single scroll dual turbo and twin scroll single turbo as "TwinPower" technology.
Yes, as the name TwinPower means it uses a turbo and something else... So whatever turbo setup it has it is only one part of he TwinPower name. The other is for example Valvetronic etc.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 11:42 AM   #224
bim2er
Lieutenant
bim2er's Avatar
United_States
224
Rep
450
Posts

Drives: '18 Mineral Grey M2
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PackPride85 View Post
BMW refers to both their single scroll dual turbo and twin scroll single turbo as "TwinPower" technology.
My understanding is that BMW has only referred to TwinPower technology for engines with twin-scroll turbo(s).

Would there be an example of an engine model number with single scroll that is referred to as "TwinPower"?

http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/t...echnology.html
__________________
'74 2002tii, Sienna Braun Metallic, Manual, Sold; '84 e28 533i, Burgundrot Metallic, Manual, Sold; '95 e36 M3, Avus Blau Metallic, Manual, Sold; '06 e60 M5, Silver Grau Metallic, SMG, Sold; '09 e82 135i MSport, LeMans Blue, Manual, Sold
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 12:08 PM   #225
PackPride85
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
1120
Rep
1,644
Posts

Drives: M2
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bim2er
Quote:
Originally Posted by PackPride85 View Post
BMW refers to both their single scroll dual turbo and twin scroll single turbo as "TwinPower" technology.
My understanding is that BMW has only referred to TwinPower technology for engines with twin-scroll turbo(s).

Would there be an example of an engine model number with single scroll that is referred to as "TwinPower"?

http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/t...echnology.html
Check the bmwusa m3 homepage. It says twinpower and uses single scroll turbos.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 12:13 PM   #226
Die ///M Rakete
Captain
Die ///M Rakete's Avatar
United_States
671
Rep
846
Posts

Drives: 2016 F80 ZCP 6MT
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Adjuster View Post
The twin turbo setup is better than the " twin power " single turbo setup. This is per BMW M engineers. I was told this directly by a BMW M engineer, because I asked the question when the 1M was introduced.


This is why the 1M was twin turbo and the n55 went into to rest of the lineup except the "is limited edition 335/135/z435.

You see that the S55 is twin turbo, the S63 in the X5 and X6M... and M5/M6..the new M6 race motor also is. Etc.

Most of the The high volume models get a single turbo - for better fuel economy, emissions, albeit slightly less potential for power.
I'm not debating the fact that the two turbos in the N54 have more flow potential than the single snail on the current N55. The math is self evident.

My contention is that the N55 upgrade in the M2 results in a motor that is more modern (Valvetronic) and will be capable of handling more boost reliably over a longer time span than the N54 with its open deck design.

What the turbo on the N55B30TO will be able to generate efficiently won't be known until it hits the market and the tinkerers start tinkering but the prospect of a mild turbo upgrade on it just got much brighter
Appreciate 2
      10-03-2015, 12:38 PM   #227
Iron Man
Major
Iron Man's Avatar
United_States
189
Rep
1,026
Posts

Drives: N/A
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by allthatisntnow View Post
Well its a good point, but the cast crank in the standard N55 was in turn 3KG lighter than the forged crank in the N54. The 3KG weight increase with the M235i would actually be a good indicator they've moved back to the old forged part? It does seem odd the way they push various things, but perhaps the X4 M40i promotion is ramping up excitement (at least engine wise) for the M2 and how its not going to be a standard N55?
That is interesting. The N54 crank actually weighs 0.8 kg more than the M235i N55 crank, plus it is a different part number, so who knows. I guess steel does have a higher density than most cast irons. Feels like a snipe hunt trying to found out. There might not be any difference, so I guess we will have to wait to see if the part number changes.

Last edited by Iron Man; 10-03-2015 at 01:11 PM..
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 02:21 PM   #228
bim2er
Lieutenant
bim2er's Avatar
United_States
224
Rep
450
Posts

Drives: '18 Mineral Grey M2
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PackPride85 View Post
Check the bmwusa m3 homepage. It says twinpower and uses single scroll turbos.
You're correct.
__________________
'74 2002tii, Sienna Braun Metallic, Manual, Sold; '84 e28 533i, Burgundrot Metallic, Manual, Sold; '95 e36 M3, Avus Blau Metallic, Manual, Sold; '06 e60 M5, Silver Grau Metallic, SMG, Sold; '09 e82 135i MSport, LeMans Blue, Manual, Sold
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 06:33 PM   #229
PrematureApex
Colonel
840
Rep
2,402
Posts

Drives: N55 X1, N54 135, s54 m3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Die ///M Rakete View Post

My contention is that the N55 upgrade in the M2 results in a motor that is more modern (Valvetronic) and will be capable of handling more boost reliably over a longer time span than the N54 with its open deck design.
Which is a point without a point. You ever see a broken N54 block? There are 800 HP+ cars out there. That engine is a brick shit house. Seriously, it's one of the strongest motors out there. I suspect the upgraded N55 will be too.

So again, even if your assumption was somehow supported, how is it relevant? How freaking strong does it need to be before it's all a wash? That's the beauty of all of these engines...you don't have to worry about the bottom ends. Literally none of them. N54, old N55, new N55...they're all very well built, with plenty of strength to handle big power over stock.

If an old N55 can hold 500 bhp, literally forever, and the new one can hold 600 bhp, forever...and you're going to run it at 400 bhp, then how the heck is the difference relevant beyond dick swinging on the internet?
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs)
'14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat)
'08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat)

Last edited by PrematureApex; 10-03-2015 at 06:42 PM..
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2015, 06:51 PM   #230
PrematureApex
Colonel
840
Rep
2,402
Posts

Drives: N55 X1, N54 135, s54 m3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

I mean, the forged crank is a good thing. We'll all take it. It's a sign they gave the car more attention than some of us thinking they may have.

But be realistic here. Some people are getting VERY excited about the strengthening of a part that didn't need any strengthening to be reliable. Take a breath.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs)
'14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat)
'08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat)
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2015, 09:32 AM   #231
Die ///M Rakete
Captain
Die ///M Rakete's Avatar
United_States
671
Rep
846
Posts

Drives: 2016 F80 ZCP 6MT
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrematureApex View Post
Which is a point without a point. You ever see a broken N54 block? There are 800 HP+ cars out there. That engine is a brick shit house. Seriously, it's one of the strongest motors out there. I suspect the upgraded N55 will be too.

So again, even if your assumption was somehow supported, how is it relevant? How freaking strong does it need to be before it's all a wash? That's the beauty of all of these engines...you don't have to worry about the bottom ends. Literally none of them. N54, old N55, new N55...they're all very well built, with plenty of strength to handle big power over stock.

If an old N55 can hold 500 bhp, literally forever, and the new one can hold 600 bhp, forever...and you're going to run it at 400 bhp, then how the heck is the difference relevant beyond dick swinging on the internet?
I see that you're quite fond of your N54. I loved my modded N54 as well.

You might be in a position to be better informed on the potential and longevity of these engines (N54/N55) than I am. I only see what goes through our service shop, what I read on the net and what the guys on our race team opine. While I modified my N54 and never had a single issue with it, I have yet to play with the N55.

However, if the strength and reliability of the N55 is good for 500hp as you say, then BMW is going through a considerable amount of time and treasure to strengthen the bottom end and block just for kicks ?!
Appreciate 1
      10-04-2015, 11:39 PM   #232
PeterPure
Major
PeterPure's Avatar
Belgium
677
Rep
1,349
Posts

Drives: BMW F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW F80 M3  [0.00]
Just FYI the N55 in M135/M235 models has a forged crank.
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 12:01 AM   #233
chmura
Colonel
chmura's Avatar
1558
Rep
2,505
Posts

Drives: 2019 M2 Competition
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County, California

iTrader: (1)

The n54 did a lot of harm than good IMO. Lots of people that I know would not buy another BMW again due to having 4+ high pressure fuel pumps go out. Yeah maybe the engine is solid but your average joe looks at the entire engine and make as a whole.

The n54 seemed of gotten fixed when the 1M got released. That means what ever flaws the N55 had will be fixed for the M2.
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 12:08 PM   #234
M3 Adjuster
Banned
Albania
7906
Rep
11,785
Posts

Drives: 1M, X1 M Sport, E46 325ic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, Tx

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chmura View Post
The n54 did a lot of harm than good IMO. Lots of people that I know would not buy another BMW again due to having 4+ high pressure fuel pumps go out. Yeah maybe the engine is solid but your average joe looks at the entire engine and make as a whole.

The n54 seemed of gotten fixed when the 1M got released. That means what ever flaws the N55 had will be fixed for the M2.
Tell Average Joe... Don't throw the motors out with the fuel pumps..! Fuel pumps that were installed in the N54 1 series were sorted before they were installed in the 1M, but this because the part was changed or improved.. nothing to do with the motor!


"Average Joe " should also realize that BMW doesn't make fuel pumps.. right?

Just because a VENDOR supplies BMW with a bad part... doesn't mean " Joe " should throw BMW out with the bathwater either.

It doesn't surprise me that if you had one failed fuel pump that you had four... because more than likely they were installing the same pump again.. Until A new vendor (or the current vendor corrects the issue) can be found to create the part... produce it... and get it to BMW... there is nothing that can be done other than install another of the same bad part. Not to mention... hundreds of parts in the supply chain eventually need to be replaced........

Speaking of bad parts... there was an issue with oil pumps on the S54 motors that came in the E46... Same deal.. BMW reacted by extending motor warranties... because the oil pumps could fail and take out the motor... As opposed to a failed fuel pump which just won't allow the car to start in your driveway.

Glad you are back... because it would really be silly to " cut off your own nose " to spite BMW's face because of a vendor part issue..

Last edited by M3 Adjuster; 10-05-2015 at 12:25 PM..
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 12:23 PM   #235
PrematureApex
Colonel
840
Rep
2,402
Posts

Drives: N55 X1, N54 135, s54 m3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkiedm4 View Post
Just FYI the N55 in M135/M235 models has a forged crank.
We've already been over that. Cite a source.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs)
'14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat)
'08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat)
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 01:50 PM   #236
PeterPure
Major
PeterPure's Avatar
Belgium
677
Rep
1,349
Posts

Drives: BMW F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW F80 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrematureApex View Post
We've already been over that. Cite a source.
Here is the crank part nr on realoem for 335i and a whole bunch of other models:
http://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/part...&q=11212163665
11212163665
AT-CRANKSHAFT WITH BEARING SHELLS
From:09/01/2009To:-Weight:20.000 kg

Then for M135i/M235i it has a different part nr and is 3kg more heavy:
http://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/part...&q=11212334334
11212334334
AT-CRANKSHAFT WITH BEARING SHELLS
From:07/02/2012To:-Weight:23.000 kg
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 01:56 PM   #237
PackPride85
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
1120
Rep
1,644
Posts

Drives: M2
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkiedm4 View Post
Here is the crank part nr on realoem for 335i and a whole bunch of other models:
http://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/part...&q=11212163665
11212163665
AT-CRANKSHAFT WITH BEARING SHELLS
From:09/01/2009To:-Weight:20.000 kg

Then for M135i/M235i it has a different part nr and is 3kg more heavy:
http://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/part...&q=11212334334
11212334334
AT-CRANKSHAFT WITH BEARING SHELLS
From:07/02/2012To:-Weight:23.000 kg
You guys do realize that with casting you can make improvements by using different alloys which can result in higher strength/weight. A different part # and weight doesn't mean its forged.
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 02:00 PM   #238
PeterPure
Major
PeterPure's Avatar
Belgium
677
Rep
1,349
Posts

Drives: BMW F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW F80 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PackPride85 View Post
You guys do realize that with casting you can make improvements by using different alloys which can result in higher strength/weight. A different part # and weight doesn't mean its forged.
Yes I know that. I got it actually from my source in Germany working close with BMW on their engines. But believe whatever you want to believe
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 02:04 PM   #239
swagon
Major General
swagon's Avatar
No_Country
13521
Rep
8,165
Posts

Drives: F80 6MT
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: .

iTrader: (0)

I've been told by a guy working for a company making engine components in Germany that BMW saves quite a lot of money per one N55 in comparison to the N54. Can't remember the exact amount, though. I was surprised.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 07:17 PM   #240
PrematureApex
Colonel
840
Rep
2,402
Posts

Drives: N55 X1, N54 135, s54 m3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkiedm4 View Post
Yes I know that. I got it actually from my source in Germany working close with BMW on their engines. But believe whatever you want to believe
We asked for a source, you gave proof of nothing but a different part number.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs)
'14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat)
'08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat)
Appreciate 0
      10-05-2015, 07:20 PM   #241
PrematureApex
Colonel
840
Rep
2,402
Posts

Drives: N55 X1, N54 135, s54 m3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swagon View Post
I've been told by a guy working for a company making engine components in Germany that BMW saves quite a lot of money per one N55 in comparison to the N54. Can't remember the exact amount, though. I was surprised.
Oh, that was a big motivator. They realized the N54 was overkill in the power handling department, overly complex (piezo injectors, etc.) and not as efficient as it could be.

Not that we need to start this discussion, but it's amazing BMW owners weren't more pissed when they yanked out the N54, gave them a less potent N55 (don't get me wrong, I love my N55 too) with a misleading "twinpower" label on it, and left pricing the same.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs)
'14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat)
'08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat)
Appreciate 1
      10-05-2015, 08:32 PM   #242
Iron Man
Major
Iron Man's Avatar
United_States
189
Rep
1,026
Posts

Drives: N/A
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrematureApex View Post
Oh, that was a big motivator. They realized the N54 was overkill in the power handling department, overly complex (piezo injectors, etc.) and not as efficient as it could be.

Not that we need to start this discussion, but it's amazing BMW owners weren't more pissed when they yanked out the N54, gave them a less potent N55 (don't get me wrong, I love my N55 too) with a misleading "twinpower" label on it, and left pricing the same.
The N54 is a great engine, but it is a poor implementation of direct injection, hence the carbon build-up issues. I believe the more recent DI engine designs are better at mitigating the problem, but I'm not sure if there are any pure DI designs that are build-up free.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.




m2
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST