Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky13
Not to dispute your butt dyna or the fact you lost to the 135 but doing a Google search says the "best" time recorded was a 4.7 in both Car and Driver and Motor Trend for the 135. The same magazines got a 4.3 and a 4.4 with the M235. Every other article said 4.8 -5.1 for the 135.
|
I agree that the M235i has been widely observed as faster than the 135, but he did rolling runs, so 0-60 differences won't tell us much. Maybe 1/4 mile trap speeds would be more telling? Not sure.