Quote:
Originally Posted by ozinaldo
And you base this claim on what?
Here is the Lotus Exige S and 1M times on another track in UK, Top Gear:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ower_Lap_Times
Shockingly Exige S is slower there too. Seemingly just a 0.1 sec but Lotus time is dry while 1M is faster on a damp track which Top Gear suggests to subtract 2 seconds further...means 2.1 seconds difference at the hand of Stig on a short track like Top Gear too.
If you watch the video in this thread again and pay attention to track times of all cars, you will see a few Lotus times there, Evora, Elise and Exige versions. None are faster than the 1M.
Again, what are you basing this claim on, can you share please? |
^^ Some people underestimate the 1M and will continue to do so for their own reasons. It's gotten so much negative talk that some people fail to realize how great the car really is.