Quote:
Originally Posted by PrematureApex
Yes, but not "because it's an M". But rather, because of the content. So your post "one is an M and one is not and that's all that needs to be said"...which has nothing to do with content, and everything to do with a label...is horrible.
BMW has been cutting back on what makes an M lately, so perhaps your assumptions...well...you know what they say.
|
I trust you're not referring to missing M 'contents' like CF roof, M mirrors, M seats etc... cos i wasn't. i'm looking at M2 v 235 predominantly from driving dynamics perspective.
edit - inb4 anyone picks up on the fact that we haven't driven the M2 and therefore I couldn't have known anything about M2 dynamics... it's just an educated guess from my 1M. 1M >> 235 but in M2, assumed similar uplift in 2er dynamics from M3/4 parts bin.